I wish I could get more into nazims head regarding what openings he told shane to go after during the fight and how he "exposed" pac... I'll tell you one thing... shane mosley was looking like pernell whitaker at times in the ring
I didn't see anything exposed. I saw Pac hurt Mosley not just when he knocked him down but quite a few times throughout the fight, and I didn't see Mosley hurt Pacquiao once. And Pac landed 50% of his power shots on Shane so that comment about him looking like Whitaker is a head scratcher
yo you are the biggest dick eater. There were NUMEROUS moments throughout the fight when shane was throwing pacquiao off with some simple head movement, dodging pacquiao's heavy shots and catching a lot of his punches. Just be honest with what happened... **** a punch stat
I think i will take Nazim Richardson's word's over yours anyday!!! Im sure he is talking about things you cant see or know about! Let the professionals to there job and you just sit back and watch!
Shane clearly lost, but only because he could no longer pull the trigger. Outside of the knockdown, Shane did decently making Pac miss and made him reach to punch, which left him open to be countered. Make no mistake, there were things that Pac had trouble with fighting Shane. He was just fighting a guy that could no longer really make him pay for those mistakes.
I don't think he got exposed as such, the fight with Mosley just confirmed what a lot of people already thought. Pacquiao's output can be decreased when he fights against people on the backfoot.
It's extreme to state that Mosley "exposed" Pac. There was something lacking in Pacquiao's fight though IMO, and it did solidify my belief that he would struggle to beat Mayweather. The key question is can Floyd take a shot like Shane took? My guess is yes, but you never know.
I'm not sure about "exposed". We saw Pacquiao's output drop, but I see that as a good thing because it meant Pacquiao limited his bad decisions. I thought against a real mover, Pac would throw and throw, regardless of openings or opportunity. It didn't happen nearly as much as I thought, which means Pac was at least thinking in there. Mosley didn't get hit as much because he ran a lot after the third round. The real question is, is it possible to counterpunch Pacquiao and NOT get hit in return. That question remains unanswered based on this fight because however infrequently Pacquiao landed on Mosley, Mosley landed even less on Pacquiao. Could Mayweather take advantage of Pacquiao's openings WITHOUT getting hit in return? Hmm...
Yeah exactly. Boxing fans tend to go to extremes though, like if they think a fighter won by a round or two and it went to the other guy it's a ROBBERY. Exposed IMO is like what Abraham has become in this tournament.
Don't disrespect Sweat Pea like that man. There wasn't any resemblance of the great Whitaker in Shane last Saturday. He looked more like Thorough Bred in the Kentucky Derby.
Why does this clown get so much coverage? All he has done is piggy-backed off the success of Hopkins, who doesn't even need a trainer at this stage. He has been a disaster with overrated steroid-cheat Mosley.:roflatsch Sister Nazim should stick to waving about swimming floats. He is a regional level swimming instructor who utters gibberish which is interpreted as wisdom by pea-brained morons.atschdead
****....PAC was the shorter man, with shorter arms and legs CHASING after a seasoned Vet looking to survive. Landing 50% of power shots against a man like Shane who was running is impressive...not the best performance from PAC but under the circumstances he did well.