SINCE 2006- Mayweather 6-0 Pac 13-0

other fights to watch and other boxers that simple

 

some of you act like im bashing Pac and saying Floyd did soemthing better...i didnt say that....i said basicly he made easy money....who wouldnt choose that route.

think about it...thats all i said

 

Well thats all well and good - But it doesn't make you better than Sugar Ray Robinson or Muhammad Ali though does it?

 

not even close:good

 

legacy don'y feed my kids. I can't live off my glory.

All titles do is collect dust

 

and he's fighting crappier versions of them. They need to reealize that bashing Floyd's resume is bashing Manny's

 

hey....Pac scraped and clawed to these pay days...was the Mosley fight and a couple others if you ask me hogwash...of course....but...come one here...he's paid his dues.....we as fans can gripe and want better fights...but he has paid his dues and who wouldnt want to collect easy money every now and then.

And before some start saying this or that fighter has been doing it since some time.....they both put in massive amounts of hard work and time compared to their years of being cash cows....they paid they're dues...we dont like it but they deserve some easy money for a chance.....plus i still feel not all either of their fights have been cupcakes....most of it is hindsight knowledge.

 

Hard to justify the records when one stays fighting and another takes vacations

of course manny would have more wins

 

Also harder to make a more solid claim as fighter of the decade when someone is being more active.

If it was "most skilled fighter of the decade" or "most efficient and effective style" then May would have no problems.

 

:rofl...the many faces of Floyd

 

From 1996-2011

Manny Pacquiao [3 losses (2 by KO) and 2 Draws]

Floyd Mayweather [0 Losses, 0 Draws]

 

but "most skilled" and "most efficient" isn't what fighter of the decade is

key word is decade

barry bonds played great from 2000-2004, that won't make him player of the decade cuz what bout 06-10