Marquez and Pacquiao are the same size

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, May 19, 2011.


  1. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,416
    331
    Jul 21, 2007
    Pac is definitely bigger now.. But **** look at Pac during their last fight at 130.. Like he was starved, and white as a ghost.. JMM mAy have Pacs number but remember....

    A GREAT BIG MAN ALWAYS BEATS A GREAT SMALL MAN

    At this point in time compared to JMM, Pac is a big man.. But **** ii give the man his shot, he deserves it..
     
  2. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    the mismatch in this fight isn't weight, its punching power and manny has a lot more now than he did a lightweight, Marquez is out of here in 9
     
  3. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    mayweather always makes it a point by refusing to be weighed on fighnight, especially against Marquez, he didnt want to show how much a ***** he would be by picking on a lightweight.
     
  4. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    last time they fought it was in JMM's favor @ 130... pac was drained as ****!
     
  5. Genaro G

    Genaro G Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,731
    0
    Aug 11, 2009
    Weighed over 160? LOL get real dude. Quit lying to yourself
     
  6. Genaro G

    Genaro G Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,731
    0
    Aug 11, 2009
    Manny has more punching power is true. Marquez goes the distance. UD for pacquiao. He cant deal with moving fighters anymore :deal
     
  7. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    Open your eyes.. Its a farce of a fight! Did you see JMM @144.. He looked like ****! Im a pac fan but this fight is Bull****! Bring on mayweather or bradley..

    Why would you want pacquiao to fight a fat man @ 145? :huh
     
  8. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    Mayweather looked big... 160-162 sounds about right!
     
  9. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    According to them *****s, Margarito and Martinez are the same size. (Margarito is Taller!)

    BUT

    Pacquiao and Marquez AREN'T. (it's not the height, it's the weight even though they are almost equal on fight night weight)

    You just can't win. *****s gona hate.
     
  10. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    :lol:
    :roll:
    :patsch
     
  11. J Griz 757

    J Griz 757 Arturo "Thunder" Gatti Full Member

    12,002
    113
    Mar 1, 2008

    This is pretty much exactly where I'm at when thinking about this fight as well.

    At least JMM is a lineal champion at his weight, and gave Pacquiao hell both times they fought.
     
  12. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    Knowing both were rehydrating at almost the same weight. they're almost the same in size.

    Now I dont believe that 144 is for jmm's advantage. It somehow for the advantage of pac. Pas has been fighting at welter weighing 144-147 aat weigh-in. It would take extra effort for pac If it would be at 140.
     
  13. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Do you understand what size means? When talking about weight, size is weight. Size is defined as "physical magnitude, extent, or bulk" and if we were talking about someones height and you said "They are the same size", that would mean they are the same height. We are talking about weight, so when I say they are the same size, if they weigh the same, they are the same size.

    You could say that you and Vitali aren't the same height or you have different builds but if you were talking about how much you both weigh, it would be accurate to say you are the same size. What don't you understand about that? This is becoming another "floored" thing because you don't understand such a simple statement.

    "Relative aggregate amount or number" size is relative to weight when talking about weight.

    Read up what the definition of size is and how to use it correctly.
    http://www.boxinginsider.com/headlines/maybe-floyd-cant-pull-the-trigger-any-more/

    http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/sports/05/15/11/marquez-braces-diaz-bout

    Again, this is what has been rumoured, mainly by Beristain and Marquez. It was also reported by The Ring and Dan Rafael, for what it's worth, seemed to add fuel to the speculation Mayweather was close to 160lbs.
    You said it yourself - Marquez looked small compared to Mayweather. How can Mayweather only be two pounds heavier than Marquez when he was so much bigger? He clearly wasn't.

    And you mention the past but can you name any time when Mayweather didn't make the weight? I agree, it would be unusual for Mayweather to bulk up when he doesn't usually but it's also unprecedented for him to not be able to make the weight limit, isn't it?
    What ever suits you best. :good[/QUOTE]It's "whatever suits you more" :good When you're looking up the definition of "size", which you don't seem to grasp, look at the difference between "best" and "more".
     
  14. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    This is a fat man?

    This content is protected
     
  15. Brian

    Brian Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,890
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    Come on, man...

    It doesn't take a genius to see that they carry the weight differently. Stop trying to justify this fight at 144. It's bull****, plain and simple. It was bull**** when Mayweather did it 2 years ago and even more so now.