Who is the greater fighter? Hopkins or Calzaghe?

:|

Look at the scoreboard - even on the wrong side of a KD Calzaghe wiped the floor with Old Man lookin' fer a rest break Popkins :deal

 

Not into animals like you, you dirty dog-****ing ****-fer-brains

Oh how convenient they don't mean **** when Calzaghe wins it :roll:

YAWN...SD does not automatically = "questionable" :deal It was only "questionable" to ******s like you because you can't accept that your great black hope could lose to a white boy, even with a KD and faking low blows for rest breaks in the latter rounds :hey

What exactly did Hopkins do with it after beating Tarver for it? Oh that's right, he fought Winky Wright and then lost it to Calzaghe :happy

Who is Ornelas?

*category*

I have no agenda - Calzaghe beat Hopkins, ergo, Calzaghe is a greater fighter than Hopkins. The fact that Hopkins has gone on to defeat Pavlik and Pascal since losing his linear LHW title to Calzaghe just goes to show he wasn't shot or washed up, which was the excuse you clowns tried to use to excuse the loss to Calzaghe (closely followed by the "He wasn't going for the KO vs Calzaghe" excuse ).

Only a typical arrogant yank would try to spin it any other way :hey

 

Dawson and Pascal are young. Lions, no.

 

214 to 45


Does Joe have 45 kids?



[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MufMdVILy28[/ame]

 

Why, you looking for some babies to shake, you silly ****?

 

ImBruMan .. you know you're a 50 year old *****. Why speak up? You need a loan?

You don't want to mix with me. I've had 3 careers and I retired in my early 30s. I'd kick your ass in the gym TONIGHT and I've already lived your every dream in LIFE.

Stick to nagging the kids on the internet about your racial inferiority complex dude.

Or, we can compare bank accounts and laugh and laugh and laugh ....:bbb

 

The keyboard warrior is strong in this one :yep

 

By spanked you mean dropped and controversially outpointed?

 

Your credibility on boxing will be at a negative -900 after this thread.


Answer me this. What do the 83 percent that voted for B-Hop have wrong? What are we missing when it comes to Calazghe and his "great" resume?

 

There you go referring to the KD again, and what's this "controversially outpointed" crap again? Calzaghe won the fight by Split Decision - once again for the dummies:

SD does not automatically = "controversial" :deal

Has anyone else in history been able to simulate anal **** on Hopkins in the ring?

Has anyone else in history been able to make Hopkins start faking low blows so he could get 5 minute rest breaks in the latter rounds?

Has anyone else made Hopkins look like a ***** like that?

 

Ah, so you run out of arguments and have to resort to what other people think...majority rules huh?

Well, look how many people in your country voted George W Bush into power, next time you go running to poll results :deal

 

Look at your VCASH :rofl Bene and Nortons wins are flukes, based on how woeful Durex and Clay were, as both were better boxersatsch

You have been nullified by me, and now by this below...

:happy:happy

 

P4P flip a coin, Legacy it's Hopkins.

 

Whatever helps you sleep at night my man. Fact remains, the vast majority of boxing fans will always hold Hopkins in higher esteem over Calzaghe.

But hey. Calzaghe will always be the man in Wales. His "historic" victories over the likes of Tocker Pudwill and Omar Sheika will be the stuff of legend for years to come. :deal

 

Yeah, just a damn shame Calzaghe doesn't have a trilogy against Robert Allen or title defences against Carl Daniels and/or Morrade Hakkar on his resume