Who is the greater fighter? Hopkins or Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, May 22, 2011.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :lol: Oh man..only kids say stuiff this dumb. You are badically suggesting, Hopkins signed to fight NO KNOWING AT ALL how good Joe C really was? Then all of a sudden FOUND OUT and then asked for double.

    Wow...hopefully you seeing how that really sounds, you will realize it's just bull****. :patsch
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,820
    2,969
    Dec 11, 2009
    :patsch That wasnt all of Calzaghes career twat :patsch.
    I know how stupid you are so wont waste too much time on a ***** like you, but Hopkins doesnt have any better wins than Eubank and undefeated Kessler, not to mention Calzaghe has a win over Hopkins also.
    America has to accept that Calzaghe beat Hopkins, Jones and Americas 2 best SMWs of the decade. That also goes for people like you that America wanted to put land between :hi:
     
  3. PFG

    PFG Active Member Full Member

    1,400
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Tbh, it's laughable this is even at debate. Calzaghe has fought very little in the way of quality opposition.
    I'm not much of a fan of Hopkins, but he cemented himself a legacy much greater than Calzaghe's.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,820
    2,969
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why dont you say how it was then ***? What did Hopkins do. He agreed to a fight, got his terms and then backed out asking for double the money, tell us how it was then twat :nut
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I wasn't talking to you, so how about you stop stalking me you ****. :rofl

    And also, that story is too ****in ridiculous to be true. If you had any brains, you'd understand that.

    Hopkins wanted more money. It's as simple as that you ****. It had nothing to do with 'all of a sudden, the NEXT DAY, he saw how good Joe C was. :patsch Do you really brelieve that? Well, you are a gullible ****, so maybe.
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    I am 100% sure I've been watching Calzaghe thoughout his career much sooner then you discovered him and decided tyo become his bggest GAYEST fanboy.

    Your word is ****. Only your little boyfriend HEADGOVER cares what you say. So...**** off stalker.
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,820
    2,969
    Dec 11, 2009
    Well ***, why dont you tell us all of the facts
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,820
    2,969
    Dec 11, 2009
    Poor little loner Uttercunt feeling sorry for himself :|. When did you start watching Calzaghe? Probably when he beat Lacy because your knowledge is so limited. Your life is based on stalking elite posters who mock you :lol:.
    Over 20000 posts later and still not found nobody who likes you. :lol:
     
  9. Mr.Pefect

    Mr.Pefect New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Apr 1, 2011
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I started watching Joe C in 2001 ******. Been watching boxing for over 20 yeas. As for Joe C, I like him. I just don't go crazy like you little boys with too much hero worship do. I'd ask when you started watching boxing, but I don't give a ****. You post like a spoiled child, and exagerrate SOO badly just to try and make a point. Actually, the more you exagerrate, the more desperate you are and more isecure you are abouty Joe C. It's not hard to read you. YOu make **** pretty obvious because, well, you just aren't clevver, smart, or witty. You're a terrible bore..:roll:
     
  11. Smacked

    Smacked Active Member Full Member

    793
    69
    Oct 14, 2010
    If calzaghe had played his cards right he should have fought pavlik and dawson back before he retired, but he didnt. It was hopkins who kept adding to his legacy. If calzaghe had beaten pavlik and dawson people wouldnt be arguing about his legacy. Basically calzaghe retired too early, beating a shell of jones jr did nothing really for him, he needed a fight or two more when he was on a bit of a roll imo

    But then again i cant really blame him for not fighting dawson, the guy brings very little to the ring at all unfortunately and if i was a fighter on the retirement trail a fight with dawson mightnt get the blood flowing at all, it could have been a bhop rematch then
     
  12. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    You've only known Calzaghe since he damaged his hands then, pity, you never saw the domestic wars away to English fighters like Delaney, Eubank, Reid and Woodhall, Calzaghe was a fast combination puncher in his early days, but atleast you would know that American fighters ducked him like the plague back in the day, Roy Jones asked Eubank should he fight Calzaghe and Eubank told a prime super skilled Roy Jones the risk is too great, Hopkins agreed to fight Calzaghe but pulled out the next day asking for double the money.

    Calzaghe beats Hopkins at any stage of their careers head to head.
     
  13. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
    misclicked:oops:

    Calzaghe the better fighter
    Hopkins the more accomplished fighter
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :patsch I've been watching him LIVE longer then you. You, on the other hand, discovered him late and played catch up not understanding ALL you missed out on. Sorry little ****, you're just a johnny-come-lately Calzaghe fanboy and no amount of you tube vids well make up for the fact that you had no clue about his career for the most part of it.

    You think you are telling me anything about him *******? You aren't. I'm aware of his hand problems. Aware of most thinga bout him. THnks that you usually have to go 'look up', since you were probably 9 when he was in his prime.:roll:
     
  15. Ant68

    Ant68 Active Member Full Member

    1,030
    1
    Dec 28, 2010
    Who thinks of this? :rasta