IMO, Taylor stifles our attack, and although in the last 2 weeks has done a few more hit ups up the middle, he is still being wasted mostly. His hard running yesterday was good, but the guy seems to have feet for hands as he spilled a number of balls. I still think he'd be better on the other side of the field where he would get early ball, and have Pettybourne there instead. Sutton and Pettybourne had a good understanding of each other in 2009, and Pettybourne scored a few trys on the back of Sutton. Yesterdays defensive effort was great, and I hope Crocker remains captain as he has made a difference. We just dropped too much ball, and our attack looked disjointed. Lacked a classy game breaker too. Overall, I'm fairly happy with the effort.
It was an entertaining game and the rabbits played fairly well for how many they had out. Warriors are overachieving at moment and will come back down to earth very soon. **** **** was once again one of the better backs along with Merritt.
how do ya work out the sharks , can towel up both last years grand finalists easily by showing pure guts and heart but get slaughted by the out of form eels by 30 plus.
Eels are like the Rabbitohs atm mate, they either lose by alot or win by alot. Cept this week Rabbitohs just missed out.
you could see tonights loss coming though. their heart and soul players were all missing. nothing to get overly excited about for the eels and i hope they take tonights win with a grain of salt.
:yep It's your brothers nickname for him and it has stuck with me. Old Rhysy has been playing alright this year but Pecks is determined to retire the ****.
You'd be an easy coach to please. If putting **** kicks in 10 meters out on the 4th, running inbetween a passer and knocking the ball on to kill any chance we had, passing the ball to the turf from dummy half, and passing the ball to the touchline... If all those qualify for a fine game by you, I'd really hate to see what you'd dub a 'bad' game. I'll give **** **** this...his positional play from defence is good, very good in fact. He just has no speed left to be damaging from kick returns. But what really shits me is how involved he seems to get in attacking raids, only to **** up, or at best be totally ineffectual. He looks for the ball like he's Jarrod Hayne, only to be easily caught due to his lack of speed. Like Roy Jones Jnr, he needs to have a look at his last few performances and then look at himself in the mirror and say "DONE!"
You'd be a horrible coach. Firstly you say Dugan has played a fair bit better than Hayne this year and now this. He should retire but he is still looks more dangerous than most of your backs. Who is your right centre? Biggest passenger in your team
whats with this planking ****. Anger at Hopoates planking stunt. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...aked-plank-stunt/story-e6freuy9-1226061661635
I'll admit, I may have had my head up my arse with the Dugan quote. I have only seen very little from both this season, and from what I've seen Dugan has been better. But the general opinion is that Hayne has been better, so I'll go with that. Dylan had a poor game, and is still learning the ropes, while Wesser is still unlearning. One has his best footy ahead of him, while the other is on a slow, or sometimes rapid decline. If I was coach, and was forced to pick Wesser, I'd severely limit his attacking freedom, and only really have him as a support player at times. He's not a playmaker, never has been, so I have no idea what he's doing trying to be one in 2011. Wesser+football = scrum to the opposition.