Is BHop the best 46 year old fighter of all time?

Is Popkins on PEDS though?

How could he improve so dramatically since the Calzaghe fight 3 years ago? He seems to have discovered another gear or two between the ages of 43 and 46...........

 

Would pick The Mongoose over him.

 

**** you Spider, dissing my Prince Naseem Hamed picture. Here you go...

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

...I hope you do go sick.

This content is protected

 

This content is protected

 

White Naz.

This content is protected

 

:huh That may be a photoshopped picture...Because this is the one I have:

This content is protected

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

Brilliant.

This content is protected

 

Moore was 45 when he last defended his title. So, he was not better than Hopkins at 46 because. The only fight Moore had at age 46 also happened to be his final bout and it was against some wrestler. So, Hopkins is the best at this age by far.

 

:huh

 

Yes. Moore rivals him for 40+, but not 46.

 

No Hamed is still the champ

 

Well, George Foreman was still lineal heavyweight champ at 47 and he looked pretty good beating Lou Saverese. He lost to Shannon Briggs at 48, but no one except the 3 judges believed George lost that fight. Still, if comparing fighters past 45 Hopkins is better.