I believe Patterson would have faced him, that is why I worded it as such instead of saying he ducked him. It doesn't change the fact that Liston should have had his title shot years earlier though. With all due respect to D'Amato, it was his job to protect his fighter (like Mickey) and not play "the morals police" by calling Listons associations and past into question. But if thats what it took to keep the title a little longer than I guess he did his job.
When you talk about "better competition" and "better fighters" that's more of a "HEAD TO HEAD" standard than anything else. I think Liston's "years waiting for a shot" and "beat all the top contenders" is a bit of a myth, or gets overplayed at least. Tunney earned his shot at Dempsey the same way.
Actually, I take back what i said. I never realised just how many heavyweights Tunney actually fought. Winert, Delaney, Carpentier, Madden, Risko, O Dowd, Burke, Spalla, Jamieson. Not all top 10 but several were top 10 at some stage and some of the light heavys he fought also fought their way into top 10.
Tunney is a Top 10 fighter in my opinion.. as he was one of if not thee most intelligent fighter ever. he had fantastic skills was fleet-footed with a devastating right-cross and excellent left-jab, he was intelligent and clever enough to be able to master Harry Greb by working out Greb's style and beating him. Tunney beat master boxers in Loughran, Gibbons,Greb, Levinsky & Delaney he withstood and mastered the rampaging Dempsey. his skills was incredible compared to other heavyweights as is his overall record of 66-1-2 from middleweight to heavyweight... Without doubt Gene Tunney is a brilliant legendary fighter and a Top 10 Heavyweight great.. Boxing Historian Tracy Callis rates Tunney No6 Heavyweight ever Boxing Historian Nat Fleischer rates Tunney No8 Heavyweight ever Charley Rose ranks Tunney No6 Heavyweight ever WBM Poll in 1974 rated Tunney No7 Heavyweight ever Nat Loubet Historian rated Tunney No6 Heavyweight ever Historian Bert Sugar rates Tunney No5 Heavyweight ever Historian John Durant rates Tunney No5 Heavyweight ever Bill Brennan rates Tunney No5 Heavyweight ever Historian Arthur Harris rates Tunney No5 Heavyweight ever. But what you are saying is all the above Boxing historians are wrong and you are right... You are a "HATER" JAB and it is now well known that you are a hater.. you hate all the great fighters from yesteryear, your posts all point to you being a hater, you claim Dempsey, Tyson, Frazier, Marciano & Tunney are not Top 10 fighters yet Tommy Morrison is up there with the all time greats, you hate on Willie Pep & Sandy Sadler and your only imput on this forum is tolling and ridicule of anyone who praises a boxer pre-1992.... you claim i have been destroyed on the Dempsey thread yet you could not be further from the truth. many knowledgable posters have voiced the same opinions as myself and made their case to prove you wrong and show you to be a HATER... you started this thread and your only case for Tunney not being a Top 10 Heavyweight is "He was not a heavyweight" Gene Tunney was The Heavyweight Champion of the World you stupid clown with All those Boxing Historians rating him as a Heavyweight...would Tommy Morrison be a heavyweight without his steroids ?
You realize most who you quoted did so generations ago or in the case of Bert (Sugar) have had a few too many ... again, no doubt Tunney was a great fighter ... just a top ten heavyweight of all time, to me a stretch .. off the top of my head .. Ali Holmes Louis Lewis Bowe Tyson Holyfield Frazier Wlad Vitali all had the size and skills sets to match up successfullly against Tunney and this is without even diging ...
Tunney would have no trouble with the behemoths you have listed here.. Wlad, Vitali, Bowe & Lewis all had terrible footwork and would never land a glove on Tunney. i would fancy Tunney to win them all by a wide magin or maybe even KO them.. if Dempsey could not KO Tunney then those 4 have no chance.
I can respect the stance that Tunney doesn't have the resume to be top 10, but the question I have is: So Liston can benefit from conjecture here, but Tunney can't? :think I think Gene could've defended the title for years and racked up defenses, but he doesn't (and shouldn't) get the credit as if he did. He'd be comfortably in the top 10 by most contemporary fans' measure had he actually done it. Yet Liston does get these sky high ratings now for rising to the top in a weak era (and looking good on film doing it, which any top 20, top 30 heavyweight ought to have), defending his title once against the same guy he blew out for it, and then quitting against a green Ali and throwing the second fight against him. Why? Because people project "what he could've done" and give him real credit for it. That's the issue I have. Now revisionism has painted Liston as some unstoppable head to head tour de force. I wouldn't even bet on him to beat Tunney.
Tell me what Tunney performances make you feel that he would defeat say Ali or Holmes by large margins ? :think
1. Joe Louis 2. Muhammad Ali 3. Jack Johnson 4. Larry Holmes 5. Rocky Marciano 6. Mike Tyson 7. Lennox Lewis 8. Evander Holyfield 9. George Foreman 10. Joe Frazier 11. Jack Dempsey 12. Sonny Liston 13. Jim Jeffries 14. Harry Wills 15. Jersey Joe Walcott 16. Ezzard Charles 17. Sam Langford 18. Wladimir Klitschko 19. Floyd Patterson 20. Riddick Bowe I can't find room for him in the top 20 let alone the top 10. At this rate, I'm actually inclined to place Vitaly Klitshcko ahead of him at Heavyweight. Tunney's body of work at Heavyweight is nowhere near sufficient to warrant that ranking.
who said he would beat Muhammad Ali... as for Holmes thats quite an easy question to answer in Jack Dempsey yet which Holmes performance makes you feel he could beat Gene Tunney.... Cooney or Norton
My list is based on legacy but if we are going to base it on who beats who? Louis, Lewis, Ali, Tyson, Holmes, W. Klithscko, Foreman, Bowe, are fighters I'd favor heavily over Tunney.
you are entitled to your opinion and so am i yet IMO Lewis, Tyson, Holmes, Bowe & The Klitschko's would really be up against it in a H2H against Tunney as they all have their pitfalls and especially against a style like Tunney has. you may as well say Hasim Rahman, Oliver McCall, Tony Tubbs, Chris Byrd, Corrie Sanders, Lamon Brewster, Michael Spinks & Buster Douglas would all beat Gene Tunney i suppose you also take them to beat Jack Dempsey :-(
Tunney and Dempsey do NOT belong in any top 20 lists because they did not fight black fighters. Duckers can't claim to be among the greatest.