Since the WBA will inevitably be stripping David Haye.....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by chitownfightfan, May 23, 2011.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,577
    13,359
    Jan 6, 2007
    Wlad is currenytly the undisputed champion.

    The Klitschkos have all four titles.

    Chagaev won the WBA title from Valuev (well before, and much more decisively than Haye did).

    Chag made two successful defences of the WBA title and was the champion.

    WBA removed his title (if you care) and then Wlad stopped Chag, making him the 'WBA champion.'

    Haye's title has no legitimacy as he won it from a guy who had already lost it to Chag.

    Haye has since ducked Chag and talked himself into a big money fight where he actually brings **** all that's legitimate to the table.

    If he beats Wlad (possible, but unlikely) he will become a HW champion for the first time.

    If the WBA 'strips' him of his title prior to the fight, the winner will still be the legitimate 3-title champ. And Vitali will have the last piece of the puzzle.
     
  2. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    Exactly! Valuev probably never intended to fight that date, he likely didn't even train knowing Sauerland had bought the title for him by staging that card outside Germany.
     
  3. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    wrong: so stfu.

    Nikolay Valuev's defence of his WBA heavyweight crown has been called off after opponent Ruslan Chagaev failed a medical on the eve of the fight.
    Their bout was due to take place in the Finnish capital Helsinki on Saturday.
    Finnish law dictates details of the failed test cannot be revealed, but a statement said Chagaev was unable to "fulfil the federation's requirements".



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7997405.stm
     
  4. Hellion

    Hellion Active Member Full Member

    738
    0
    Nov 14, 2008

    Yes but......

    http://www.boxnews.com.ua/en/news/5369/2009-06-02/Kohl-Chagaev-healthy-Valuev-a-coward

    and......

    "The Finnish Federation explained in today’s hearing that they have not prohibited the fight, but wanted Nikolai Valuev to agree to a passive protective inoculation (immunglobuline) within 24 hours of the fight. A decision from Valuev was not communicated."

    http://www.boxnews.com.ua/en/news/5368/2009-05-31/Universum-considering-lawsuit-

    also.....

    "Valuev's promoter Wilfried Sauerland said his man had been given the option of going ahead with the contest and then receiving two injections after it, but he had turned it down."

    http://www.bangkokpost.com/business/economics/18247/

    Since I've posted a statement from the Finnish Federation showing your post to be incorrect does that mean I get to say STFU to you now? :D
     
  5. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    the next line after this is:

    "Because of that, Chagaev's team labelled Valuev a "coward" even though the Finnish Federation said they would not have allowed a boxer into the ring with Hepatitis B anyway.
    So although it was Chagaev carrying the blood disease, his team still tried to make Valuev out to be the villain"
     
  6. Hellion

    Hellion Active Member Full Member

    738
    0
    Nov 14, 2008
    Even so, you're ignoring the statement from the actual federation. Go figure.
     
  7. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Great post :good

    You got ****ing owned accept it.
     
  8. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    but according to one of the articles you posted the actual federation said they wouldn't let him fight.

    all sounds a bit confused...like a bunch of stuff happened in 24 hours that all conflicted with itself.

    regardless...that 2nd article is about how chagaev was going to sue...if he was in the right how come he didn't?
     
  9. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    :lol:
    fair enough. i'll stfu.

    i still don't believe there was any conspiracy to keep the title away from wlad.
     
  10. Hellion

    Hellion Active Member Full Member

    738
    0
    Nov 14, 2008
    Ahh no probs, it's all moot now anyway, we're going to have a unification.

    But back to the previous point, there was a wierd thing going on at that event, King was lobbying the WBA to have Chagaev stripped immediately after. Plus these statements from doctors and Chagaevs promotors

    http://www.boxnews.com.ua/en/news/5369/2009-06-02/Kohl-Chagaev-healthy-Valuev-a-coward
     
  11. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    Q: How did the cancellation happen?
    WS: The Finnish Federation requested an additional test because Chagaev´s hepatitis test had shown some positive values. At first, Universum refused, and when the Finnish Federation considered a cancellation, Universum informed them that they had ordered a test in Helsinki. Then all the parties involved agreed to let the fight happen if the test was negative like the attestation from Germany. After many delays the test was handed over by Universum on Friday evening, with the result being a low, yet not totally excludable danger of infection. Subsequently, the Finnish Federation called the bout off.

    Q: Was there no chance to save the fight?
    WS: There was the proposal of Nikolai getting an injection within 24 hours after the fight and then again another one four weeks later. Nikolai asked for some time to think about it and wanted to speak to his doctor, who was on his way from Russia, first. However, that did not happen because the Finnish Federation informed us they would not let a fighter in the ring who suffers from Hepatitis B illness and presents a danger of infection, no matter how low.

    Q: There are experts who claim that the danger of infection is as good as zero.
    WS: There is a big difference between “as good as zero” and zero. During the meetings in Helsinki I offered Chagaev´s doctor and Universum to stage the fight if they confirmed in writing an acceptance of risk (underwriting). They refused.
     
  12. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    http://boxsportonline.de/en/news-ar...ticle/interview-mit-wilfried-sauerland-1.html
     
  13. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    Haye will become super champion for this fight so he wont loose hid title.
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    None of these belts or titles matter so long as the k bros remain undefeated. There can be no true champ since they aint fighting each other. This is merely 1 vs 3. The best heavyweight fight that can be made but the titles mean jack.
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    This Chagaev thing is a joke.

    The man carries Hep B, which is a dangerous and debilitating condition, it's not just as simple as ''take the vaccine'', fighters in the UK are given these vaccines before they get a licence.

    Over here, it was Chagaev's health that was the concern, hence why the board were reluctant to allow him to fight over here.

    As for the argument of ''why not fight somewhere else'', Haye is under the juristiction of the British board, because he holds a British licence, and could have been banned/fined had he gone through with the fight elsewhere.

    The WBA title should really belong to Wlad, that I think everyone accepts, but it doesn't, Haye holds it and has done for 18 months..... and they are fighting in a few week's time.