Carl Froch "Dirrell´s weak"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Goodhill, May 25, 2011.


  1. Joe.Boxer

    Joe.Boxer Chinchecker Full Member

    7,608
    1,107
    Jan 8, 2011
    Froch is a warrior but when it comes to Kessler & Dirrell he doesn't half talk shite. He's a broken record too.
     
  2. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Quillin is a fast rising Middleweight contender who just dispatched contender Brinkley like was nothing.'

    You dont follow much boxing do you?
     
  3. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006

    Wait.... back up, Kid Chocolate.... are you saying punches landed in a clinch don't count?

    Also, your Ricky Hatton comparison is **** because it was Dirrell initiating those clinches, not Froch.

    Kid Quillin. Don't ape being knowledgeable about this when you make stupid claims like the one I'm quoting of yours.
     
  4. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    eh, I'm not repeating myself over semantics. Not a fight I care that much about. I explained already how I saw it as EFFECTIVE aggression. Dirrell had the tools but he didn't pull it off in my eyes.

    Lots of people liked Dirrell there. I didn't. Too much holding, too much theatrics and acting and a lost point. I'm not giving Dirrell extra points because he hurt Froch in one of them or because it was his first 12 rounder.
     
  5. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    Quillin is a ****ing joke who is a level lower than Joe Greene of all people.
    Quillin struggled with D. Miranda.

    Yes, I follow boxing much.

    Your admiration of Quillin helps make sense to me how you might think Dirrell won that fight.
    In other words, you're a ****ing moron.
    Also, he's a supermiddle.
     
  6. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    I agree it was much closer than Froch acts like it was.
     
  7. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Could it be.....






    ...EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION?!?!?!?
     
  8. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    I've never seen anyone say they do. But regardless, Froch's punches usually landed to the back of the head. He had very few if any clean work to the body or face when clinched. Infact it was Dirrell who was usually trying to work on the inside, it was Froch complaining.


    Show me rounds where Froch swung the round his way in the clinch. Matter of fact, go find 7 of them to justify giving Froch the fight.


    You are the coward who has yet to post a scorecard.
     
  9. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Quillin has his flaws, but he has real power, and is now training with Freddie Roach. He easily dispensed of a fighter who was able to touch Lucian Bute up quite a bit.

    Quillin would most likely KO Joe Green.
    first post your scorecard.


    Second, Quillin is from my hometown and him and Dirrell are nothing alike. Ones a middleweight, the others a supermiddleweight. One's a slick boxer, the others a aggressive boxer puncher with KO power.


    One is elite(Dirrell) the other is far from elite but is working is way up steadily and has the correct mindset to make noise.



    Sorry buddy, only joke around here is you. :good
     
  10. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    You dumbass.... you made this silly little challenge like 2 minutes ago.
    Hey Quillin, go watch a fight from over 2 years ago that went all rounds and come back with your score card in 2 minutes.

    Quillin, you thought you were a fast rising middle weight when you're fighting at super middle. YOu don't even know the weight class your idolized boxers are in.
     
  11. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    EFFECTIVE aggression is landing punches. Not swinging wildly and looking "goofy" a word you used not me.


    Like I said, I've watched the fight multiple times, you go largely off memory. Not a debate you can win.
     
  12. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    Quillin hasn't fought anyone the level of Vanes. So you have no idea if he's better than Greene or not.
    And AGAIN, Quillin is a supermiddle. Please, go to boxrec or ring or somewhere and check for yourself.

    And I'm the joke?
     
  13. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    man what the **** :bart
    how is that maflucker not penalized at all in this fight. He lost this **** clearly and should have haver points deducted a few times in that fight
     
  14. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    You're as depressed as Detroit is.
    Those punches Froch was landing in the clinch were clean. Clean shots to the head, clean shots to the body.

    EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION.
    You're really really bad at this.
     
  15. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    So you admit you really know nothing about the fight then? So why should you be held credible at all when you last saw the fight 2 years ago and cant even recall a scorecard?

    Sorry buddy, I think its your bed time.

    The interview Quillin had before he fought Brinkley said he wants to fight at middleweight and is targeting Sergio Martinez. Shall I bring that interview up and show you how big a fool you are?