Carl Froch "Dirrell´s weak"

Dirrell really stunk the place out. The fans should have got their money back for his non-performance. Dirrell's purse should have been divided amongst the paying fans

 

Clean shots to the back of the head. Nothing to the body all from what I remember. I think he landed one body shot while the ref was breaking and the ref warned him. The only round where Froch did good work in the clinch was like the 7th or 8th where Dirrell was complaining to the ref and Froch was able to finally land some clean punches when Dirrell wasnt looking at him. Other then that it was all rabbit punches.


You really dont know much about boxing do you? ARe you British?

 

No its not. Its a seperate scoring critera from clean effective punching.

I've watched the fight a few times. I can win. I've had this conversation on other sites.

Again, wild and goofy- doesn't matter. A scoring blow is a scoring blow.

 

Recent interview from Quilliins camp

He certainly was impressive, looking real strong against Brinkley, but Petey is going back down to 160 for good. We took this one fight against Brinkley because it was a great opportunity, but Petey is a middleweight, and I believe he’s the biggest puncher there. After the fight Brinkley told me Petey hits harder than (Lucian) Bute. We’ve been patient all along and there’s no reason to change now.”



Wow looks like I've owned you buddy. Like I said, you should just take a nap. I think you're tired.

 

Post your scorecard. I'll show you where you are wrong.

If the blow doesnt land cleanly, misses or isnt effective it doesnt count. Sorry.

 

shut up. Beating somebody's ass is Mosley vs Margarito or Mayweather or Pacquiao vs Mosley

Nobody beat anybody's ass in this fight, but Dirrell did win it :rofl

I can't believe you said that ****

 

I'm not posting my scorecard. I'd have to watch the whole fight again and I;m not really into it.

I either had it 116-111 for Froch or 115-112. I think 115-112. 116-111 sounds wide.

 

Froch landed cleanly a fair bit.

A scoring blow doesn't have to cave a guys face in.

 

You can at best give Froch 5 rounds. Thats at the most. 6 is nonsense.


How did you score rounds 10, 11 and 12?

 

Frochy is ******ed!

 

If Froch landed cleanly quite a bit. Why are there loads of Dirrell videos showing his work in the fight, and none of Froch?

I counted Froch landed at best 5 power punches the entire fight. He had some shoe shining work to the body in the 12th, a couple rabbit punches and a few glancing jabs.


Thats about it for his "clean" work.

 

Properly.



Seriously, I think I had Dirrell winning mostly in the late rounds, Froch earlier. I don't really remember.

 

Owned?

I bet Tyson hit harder than Douglas too. Theres alot more to boxing than hitting hard.

 

See you dont even remember how you scored individual rounds. You really cant debate here.

Dirrell swept the last 3 rounds. 10 being 9-9 because of the point deduction. So you have to have Froch winning 6 of the previous 9 rounds. We've already established Dirrell easily won round 5. So Froch had to win 7 of these rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9.

Which rounds do you believe he took?

 

eh

If you like. I think the problem is that you scored the "whole fight." No way Dirrell won all those early rounds with all that holding. Rounds are 3 minutes long, they include more than the 5 seconds per round that Dirrell fought.