No offence but you dirrell supportes really do sound like Whining children lol. Al i ever see is Robbery Robbery Robbery!. If Dirrell truly was as good as u all claim why is everything around him so contreversial. Robbery to Froch, the was it fake or not KO to AA, the im to scared to fight my friend Ward, the ive got serious neurological damage but it will magically be cured by my dr so i can resume training, ect You have a go at froch in every thread for acting an ass yet support a boxer that coems across as a major grade A decietfull coward. To me its just stupid national pride.
Some people actually judge each fight on its own merits, and are not nuthuggers as some here obviously are. A mirror comes in handy...
I thought froch kessler could have gone either way, froch won the first half and kessler the second, but it was poetic justice for froch after being given the nod against dirrell
And except for nuthuggers or a few revisionist countrymen, Dirrell won by a larger margin. If held in the USA or a neutral country Froch might have been DQed, or at least he would have been the one with pt deductions for all the rabbit punches, judo throw etc. You think with what Benn did to McClellan, British judges would never come close to allowing that sh*t again. But there is still denial about that one too. Amazing in both these cases, how videos are not capable of being seen as they are. A mind is a terrible thing sometimes.
punches landed Froch 153/475 32% Dirrell 105/315 33% and along with the judges jimmy iowa and dan rafael both scored it for froch as did allan green and manny stewart. press row 2 had it for Froch one a draw. Froch won. If Direll had and balls whatsoever he could have won...but he didn't.
Don't put words in people's mouths or think that everyone judges these matters by country as some obviously do. Some of us Amercians might wish Ward would get DQed, or go away, with his headbutting crap too. Frankly would like Froch to beat him. That doesn't change the fact that Dirrell and Kesler clearly beat Froch.