Froch did not beat Dirrell contrary to what his nuthuggers might say

froch is one of my favourite fighters but the worship he gets on here is ridiculous. people claim he is british P4P#1 which doesnt actually mean anything as far as im concerned, but if anyone is it has to be haye, popular these days or not.

it makes me laugh that the same people score the dirrell fight as a froch win and the groves degale fight as a groves win. personally i had dirrell and degale as the winners of the respective fights and that is coming from someone who likes the other in both cases- although in fairness i know my opinion counts for ****, you guys are british fighter/darling-fighter biased big time.

 

On what criteria would you rate Haye above Froch? Froch has fought higher ranked opponents in a more competitive division.

I simply cannot compute how you had DeGale AND Dirrell winning their respective fights.

 

I had Dirrell and degale too but the former was an utter **** of a fight to score and the latter hinged on 1 or at most 2 contentious rounds so whoever got the nod it was no robbery

Stop crying because people don't agree with you

 

Froch is a great fighter, and the most likeable of all the british boxers due to style and attitude. but disecting his resume is easier than most - i won't even bother to go through each because everyone has heard it before. also, i remember a comment from froch about how he really doesnt even watch boxing that much and didn't he come a cropper on question of sport for something stupid too? like i say, i like him, but as he's flavour of the year he gets no abuse whereas all the others do.

second point - degale won by 2 on my card, its just how i had it, its not "un-computable" - he landed better shots and showed more intent. dirrell landed far better shots, its not in question.