Carl Froch "Dirrell´s weak"

Exactly. Dirrell has moved on and yet you haven't. Considering the cowardly way Dirrell ran and held, it's a strange pick of as fight to be so vigilant about. Dirrell accepted he made mistakes and has moved on. You should do the same.

 

Last time I checked, "mature professionals" didn't pretend to be knocked out in order to win. That leg twitching was just embarrassing.

 

When people say wrong things or lie I have to correct them. As I am constantly doing with you.

Dirrell may feel he should have been more active like he was when he was beating Froch's ass from round 10 on. But never has he felt he lost.

Again I have no problem correcting liars like you. I dont start the Dirrell vs Froch threads anymore, but I'll gladly finish them. :thumbsup

 

Location: United Kingdom


All that needs to be said.

 

Btw, you limey's enjoying Barcelona teaching you how to play soccer as much as I am?

 

Probably more. I hope United's coach crashes on their way home.

 

Dirrell thinks he didn't finish strong enough:

'“Now I know what it’s like to try and take the belt from a champion,” said Dirrell (18-1, 13 knockouts). “I learned against Froch that you can’t have close fights in this day and age. I’ve learned that pro boxing is about finishing strong. It’s not about getting by on just skill. It’s about showing your opponent and showing the judges that you are there, that you‘re for real.”'

Dirrell accepts he lost and knows what he should have done differently. If you think he won, fine, but accept that even Dirrell can see why he lost. You can't see that. You also disagree with Dirrell that it was close.

Like I said, your stance is more vigilant than Dirrell's. Even the horrible **** Shaw doesn't moan as much as you do.

 

Lets face facts,Audley Harrison knows Dirrells momma very well,a chip off the old block.

 

okay

 

Still coming back for another schooling .
Andre Ward has only beaten an unwell Kessler with the assistance of illegal head use and a ref that warns Kessler for head use :barf.
Then you rate Ward for beating Abraham atsch.
Ward looked real good against Bika . Ive read some posters on here (not me) thought that fight was a draw

 

Jack really bust up Bitchigan with this post

 

When Dirrell says this:

"It’s about showing your opponent and showing the judges that you are there, that you‘re for real."

He is acknowledging why he lost. That's why he doesn't ***** about it because even he knows why he lost. You can argue he did win, that's fine, but don't argue it wasn't close and don't argue it was impossible to score it for Froch. That's stupid and it's not even something Dirrell does.

Immediately after the fight, the only person crying robbery was Shaw. After watching the fight over and over, even he has mellowed. 2 of the 3 judges and every journalist in the arena had it for Froch, Dirrell's team said he could have done more and even Dirrell himself knows why he didn't win.

If you think he won, that's fine. Its about time the cries of robbery ended though. Not only is the fight irrelevant now but it's something Dirrell would disagree with anyway.

 

I thought Froch won. Dirrell didnt do enough, but that was a great post of yours :good

 

Dirrell landed more significant shots and even had the "champ" hurt in the championship rounds (10th, 11th and 12th), and that still wasnt enough to win over the local judges...Dirrell did more then froch. Dirrell should of won a close SD....fight was close though

 

Froch also missed a hell of allot but im sure the judges were influcenced by the crowd as it seem even when he missed with shots the crowd would errupt ..