Out of Monzon, Hagler, and Hopkins: who had best chance to beat both?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Punch_Drunk, May 28, 2011.

  1. Punch_Drunk

    Punch_Drunk The Sweet Science Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    If they were all matched up against each other who had the best chance or style to go 2-0.
     
  2. D.T

    D.T Guest

    The Marvelous one
     
  3. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    19,654
    Likes Received:
    52
    Monzon, IMO.
     
  4. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,063
    Likes Received:
    34
    Monzon. He isnt getting KOed by either and i dont see any of the two out boxing him.
     
  5. gumbo2176

    gumbo2176 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    1
    As much as I like Hagler, I'd have to go with Monzon on this call.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    65,926
    Likes Received:
    53,140
    Monzon.

    I've been watching a lot of Hopkins in the last week. There are so many holes in his game, but he hides most of them well. Hagler is my 2nd fave middle ever but I think (by a very narrow margin) that Monzon could upset his applecart with strength, persistence and his amazing control of distance and pace.
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,042
    Likes Received:
    7,578
  8. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,063
    Likes Received:
    34
    People are voting for Hagler but not posting. Talk to us people, lets get some debate flowing.
     
  9. Commando

    Commando Guest

    Hagler....and that's the bottom line cause Commando said so.
     
  10. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,063
    Likes Received:
    34
    Why?:think
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    28,760
    Likes Received:
    86
    Could you be more specific Seamus, I'm curious on your take.
     
  12. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,600
    Likes Received:
    3
    Monzon was great but I feel like people overrate him just a tad. He had all he could handle from Bennie Briscoe. Briscoe was no can but he was no Hagler either. I'd take Hagler. Hopkins loses to both IMO.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    65,926
    Likes Received:
    53,140
    Specific regarding what?

    Regarding Hopkins, I love the guy, but he's not a combo artist, he's dirty as ****, leads with his head, gets off balance, headbutts, kidney punches, fakes low blows.... On the other hand, he uses space well, has a great knack for the single shot counter, decent power, sturdy beard and will never let anyone look good against him, even when he's obviously losing.

    Regarding Monzon v Hagler, it's a close call. I think in Briscoe and Valdez, Monzon beat a lot of the factors Hagler brought to the table. And Hagler had trouble against several lesser luminaries... Monzon arrived to the ring with great consistency, always in shape, always giving a championship effort. You don't go 80 or so fights undefeated by accident.
     
  14. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    7
    Monzon. Just above MMH.
     
  15. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,931
    Likes Received:
    82
    Hagler, because he had a little bit of everything. The speed and the skill to work his way in and out of Monzon's range, all the while gradually working the body with effective punching. He had the technical abilities to rival those of Hopkins, and also the physical abilities and tenacity to wear him out.