So, it's possible to make a rather lengthy highlight reel for one fighter (Dirrell). It's not possible to make a highlight reel for the other fighter. Can't be done. Try it, if you like! Highlight reel, one fighter. No highlight reel possible, other fighter. Now, on the basis of that fact. Who do you think won the fight? The guy with the lengthy highlight reel, or the guy for which a highlight reel can't be made? You do the math.
Highlight reels are the problem. Sure you can make a vid of Dirrell landing all of his punches, most don't debate that he did land the crisper shots but 2 or 3 good shots a round while running around the ring, holding and falling on the floor isn't winning a fight for anyone. Plus most HL reels won't include the point deduction.
I can't tell whether you're being serious. By your standards, Margarito should have gotten the nod against Pacquiao for being the aggressor and taking punches to the face so astonishingly well. You would also score all of the Ali-Liston (first fight) rounds for Sonny because Cassius "ran" like a chicken. I'm really not sure whether to take you seriously at this point.
Post your source for that. Of course I can. I've dont it many times before. Post your scorecard. I can go through it with you round by round with video's and show you why if you give Froch more then 4 rounds ur a fool
Why do you do it to yourself atsch. Jack has schooled you and made you look silly . Get a new favourite fighter, one that puts it on the line in a title fight, doesnt clapse from an illegal arm punch, and doesnt find a way not to fight another champ. Based on your cowardly comments you must really love these stay at home babies . Hope this helps you along. I have started to pity you, watching you get owned on every post
How can he be fighting again in a few months? he had to drop out of the S6 due to neurological damage. Neurological damage is conditions like Puglists Dementia i thought. These type of conditions dont get better and would stop a boxer being allowed a licence to box.
Aww Jack has a cheerleader. Its a match made in heaven. Both of you are pretty much despised by everyone
As much as i am a Froch fan, he does spout of a fair bit it does make me laugh. As far as Dirrel is concerned i am suprised Dirrel isnt number 1 supermiddle weight in the world, definately the most skilled boxer in the division if he had Froch's heart and desire i think he would be untouchable, he lacks that i think if he was more aggresive with Froch he would of stopped him but he seemed to not want to know after he felt a couple of hard shots which led to a **** poor fight, with Froch chasing him all night and being the aggressor thats why the right mans hand was lifted at the end of the fight..
I' d say that this topic has been chewed to the bone. Most agree that Dirrell vs Froch was a hard to judge and could have gone the other way around as well. In this perspective Froch's statement that it was easy fight for him, is nothing but thrash-talk. When it comes to "Dirrell's weak" -part, I'd say that Froch has a point. Dirrell could use some more punching power and courage to lead the fights and show dominance even if it means taking risks in the ring. I'm not too keen on Dirrell after the brain-stuff and root more for brawler-/puncher -types who are willing to engage and give audience Fistical Feuds and 100 % action packed boxing drama. But still I have to admire Dirrell's technicue and versatile ring-movement.