Calzaghe's resume and legacy is better than Pac's because...

I personally don't think jmm will go onto surpass hopkins, I don't think he'll come close. But if he somehow beats pac and then again in a rematch he'd have a bloody home argument.

 

well jmm at 37 beating the p4p#1 pac at a weight he dominated would be much better than a 46 year old bhop beating a 28 years old pascal or any bhop win even his win against trinidad. so yeah jmm beatin pac would be tremendous and it would shoot jmm's ATG through the roof.

 

I think the best thing for pac's legacy (assuming he doesn't face martinez) would be to lose a controversial decision to jmm, knock him out in a rematch, knock out ortiz and then retire unless he can secure a fight with floyd. That probably sees him in the top ten.

Ideally he'd also rematch torrecampo and singsurat haha

 

wtf...

 

Big Pac/Calzaghe fan here, but man, don't use that argument. We all know Morales was on the decline due to weight issues while Marquez is pretty much older than Pac when they fought.

Both Pac and Calzaghe fought men not near their primes, but nearly all of them were still world-class operators. I mean seriously, look at Hopkins still fighting years later and winning.

You might say these guys aren't prime, but greatness is greatness.

I would probably even say that a more active Bhop is an easier fight for Calzaghe because more punching equals more Calz counterpunching, but that's for another topic.

 

I think Pac cherry icks over the hill fighters and takes big names on who are past their best. He also thrives on Floyds leftovers.

However I think Pac has foguth the better opposition. Jow fought plenty of window washers and past it champions too.

 

the only cherry pick fighters for me that floyd fought are bruseless,mitchell, and marquez. Gatti fight is ok since gatti is champ and a big name, baldomir is the lineal champion so that gets a pass for me, but I would have called that cherry pick if he got no belt.

pacquiao on the other hand, i feel has cherry pick the following fighters. Diaz and mosley, and now marquez but a lot of people still believe in marquez so he kinda gets a pass for this fight but the way i see it, its the same as what floyd has done. I can't think of any other fighers that were viewed as cherry pick, I don't buy what other people says about other pac opponents. They're legit contenders

 

STFU crackhead.atsch

 

Comedy thread of the year so far, well done. :thumbsup

 

These calzombies are somewhat delusional .

 

At least try and debate what he has written. Insults without an answer show a complete lack of knowledge

 

No they don't, they show that the argument is too ludicrous to even be taken seriously or dignified. Do you really not understand this concept?

If I say to you "Big Enzo Mac would shatter Big George Foreman's Glass Mandible", would you take the time and put in the effort to writing a serious reply to detail how and why I was so very wrong?

If you would, you have too much time and too little sense. :good

 

So you have posted on here several times on something you find too ludicrous to take seriously atsch. Which probably means you want to find a decent counter point and cant .
Yes if you genuinly thought E Mac would shatter Georges Mandible then I would presume you are reffering to a prime George and ask you to try and justify, which for something so ludicrous you probably couldnt, but here on this post to thread starter has given reasons to his points and you havent been able to counter atsch.

Try harder Popkins

 

This is why I spend less and less time on the boxing forum

 

Not worthy of a debate .

I wasnt trying insult anyone , i was stating a fact You Calzombies are delusional at times . Well... some of you,Not all of you . Im not going to say all of you are ,cause ive spoken to some Calzaghe fans who are levelheaded and dont lie to themselves like the diehards do .