Carl Froch "Dirrell´s weak"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Goodhill, May 25, 2011.


  1. boxingboy

    boxingboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,767
    0
    Sep 30, 2010
    ward will box froch's ears off in the final
     
  2. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    So, it's possible to make a rather lengthy highlight reel for one fighter (Dirrell).

    It's not possible to make a highlight reel for the other fighter. Can't be done. Try it, if you like!

    Highlight reel, one fighter. No highlight reel possible, other fighter.

    Now, on the basis of that fact. Who do you think won the fight? The guy with the lengthy highlight reel, or the guy for which a highlight reel can't be made?

    You do the math.
     
  3. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Highlight reels are the problem. Sure you can make a vid of Dirrell landing all of his punches, most don't debate that he did land the crisper shots but 2 or 3 good shots a round while running around the ring, holding and falling on the floor isn't winning a fight for anyone. Plus most HL reels won't include the point deduction.
     
  4. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    I can't tell whether you're being serious. By your standards, Margarito should have gotten the nod against Pacquiao for being the aggressor and taking punches to the face so astonishingly well.

    You would also score all of the Ali-Liston (first fight) rounds for Sonny because Cassius "ran" like a chicken.

    I'm really not sure whether to take you seriously at this point.
     
  5. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    rofl

    Are you being serious comparing how Dirrell fought Froch to how Pac fought Tony?
     
  6. avidreader82

    avidreader82 Member Full Member

    218
    0
    Jan 4, 2009
    I forgot how good Dirrell is!!!
     
  7. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Very good. Very talented. Should be back fighting in a few months. :good
     
  8. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol: Post your source for that.








    Of course I can. I've dont it many times before. Post your scorecard. I can go through it with you round by round with video's and show you why if you give Froch more then 4 rounds ur a fool
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why do you do it to yourself :patsch.
    Jack has schooled you and made you look silly :lol:.

    Get a new favourite fighter, one that puts it on the line in a title fight, doesnt clapse from an illegal arm punch, and doesnt find a way not to fight another champ.


    Based on your cowardly comments you must really love these stay at home babies :lol:.

    Hope this helps you along. I have started to pity you, watching you get owned on every post :D
     
  10. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    How can he be fighting again in a few months? he had to drop out of the S6 due to neurological damage. Neurological damage is conditions like Puglists Dementia i thought. These type of conditions dont get better and would stop a boxer being allowed a licence to box.
     
  11. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Aww Jack has a cheerleader. Its a match made in heaven. Both of you are pretty much despised by everyone :lol:
     
  12. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    As much as i am a Froch fan, he does spout of a fair bit it does make me laugh. As far as Dirrel is concerned i am suprised Dirrel isnt number 1 supermiddle weight in the world, definately the most skilled boxer in the division if he had Froch's heart and desire i think he would be untouchable, he lacks that i think if he was more aggresive with Froch he would of stopped him but he seemed to not want to know after he felt a couple of hard shots which led to a **** poor fight, with Froch chasing him all night and being the aggressor thats why the right mans hand was lifted at the end of the fight..
     
  13. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Dirrell got a couple of cheer leaders Dr Shaw HI, and the Bitchiganwarrior :patsch
     
  14. Goodhill

    Goodhill Iron Horse - born to lose Full Member

    3,077
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    I' d say that this topic has been chewed to the bone.

    Most agree that Dirrell vs Froch was a hard to judge and could have gone the other way around as well. In this perspective Froch's statement that it was easy fight for him, is nothing but thrash-talk.

    When it comes to "Dirrell's weak" -part, I'd say that Froch has a point. Dirrell could use some more punching power and courage to lead the fights and show dominance even if it means taking risks in the ring.

    I'm not too keen on Dirrell after the brain-stuff and root more for brawler-/puncher -types who are willing to engage and give audience Fistical Feuds and 100 % action packed boxing drama. But still I have to admire Dirrell's technicue and versatile ring-movement.
     
  15. Chibuku

    Chibuku I'm awesome Full Member

    3,300
    1
    Jul 4, 2008
    Carl got a home cooked decision,Dirrell whooped his ass.Deep down he knows it & he's feeling guilty.