Bernard Hopkins retires from Boxing

But Chad Dawson........ is a ****ing "No Mark".

 

I know he's a "No Mark"......

But he has physical and technical skills.

You're trying to be funny, and you're using the term "No Mark" in the wrong context.

 

How is it in the wrong context?

"Who gives a **** about him?"

Where's the excitement.......where's the violence......where's the flare?

 

Was Jean Pascal vs Chad Dawson a dull fight..? it was more eventful and intense than Hopkins vs Pascall I & II.

Was Adamek vs Dawson a dull fight..? Nope.

Where's his flare..? Chad Dawson can actually throw quality combinations, come straight down the middle, or get hook happy.

Bernard Hopkins inside of the ring, has very little flare. He's a basic, and crafter, wise operator.

At the end of the day, its not about...."WHO GIVES A **** ABOUT HIM"..?

This is all about......."WHO BERNARD HOPKINS FIGHTS NEXT"..?

And I'm 90% percent sure it will be Chad Dawson.

I know you're trying to be smart, and abIt witty. But at the end of the day, the point i am trying to make.

Is that Bernard Hopkins is possibly going to face Chad Dawson next.

A........."No Mark", with physical and technical skills.

Just like the term "No Mark" you have got to use it in the right context. Bernard Hopkins and his fans are getting carried away, and are not keeping things in context.

"He cannot cope with a fighter like Chad Dawson........Its over"

 

very poor thread. people try to be funny by making fake thread titles but it just makes them looks stupid imo

 

No it wasn't.

When was the last time he did that?

 

Its over now mate, you have tried to be smart and witty.

But it just has not gone down well.

Chad Dawson has physical and technical skills. He's not a ****** like Kelly Pavlik and he knows how to throw straight punches.

Simple basic things, that Jean Pascal Neglected against Bernard Hopkins. "And reverted back to being a complete ******" when he was showing real promise.

We can sit here all day, and nip pick. We can sit here all day, and try to be funny.

The botton line is, Chad Dawson is maybe Bernard Hopkin's next opponent.

I totally agree with Teddy Atlas, as soon as Hopkins is inside of the ring with a athlete/boxer who knows how to do these basic things, and also had serious physical and technical skills.

"He's going to be totally ****ed"

 

Moral to this thread.

"Don't try and be smart, if it's not going to go down well"

 

second option!

 

Like your whole boring act?

Is this why you keep making new accounts?

 

Chad Dawson has the ability to work at a high workrate. Its the share workrate and physical skills/attributes that will ****ed Hopkins up.

"I'm keeping things in context, Hopkins vs Pascal was not a complete domination. It was not a demoralising beat down for Pascal, it was a competitive fight, Hopkins was tired at times, and hurt"

And his workrate is still nothing special.

Bernard Hopkins could not cope, or handle Jermaine Taylor. Bernard Hopkins was reduced to throwing 10-12 punches a round against Jermaine Taylor during the second fight. Chad Dawson can throw fast accurate combinations, "Nobody where can disupte this"....Chad Dwason is also good at throwing single shots.

"Hopkins in his entire career, cannot cope with athletic fighters who can serious box, know the basic's"

A fast long jab, will totally shut down Bernard Hopkins.

And now that he has Manny Stewart in his corner, all of this pays into his favour. Chad Dawson has allot of physical skills, and if he imposes himself on his opponents, they cannot cope. But the thing is with Dawson, he sometimes comes down to his opponents level.

Lennox Lewis used to do it, before he grouped with Manny Stewart.

Wladimir Kiltschko used to do it, before he grouped with Manny Stewart.

Chad Dawson is now with Manny Stewart. And even if he was'nt with Manny Stewart, i think he would STILL beat Hopkins.

"EASY"

 

Hopkins will dominate that mental midget.

He was completely suckered by a relatively average fighter in Pascal.... he's only comfortable against shot old men like Tarver.

Johnson beat him the first time.

 

Moral of this thread.

"Don't try to be smart, if its not going to go down well"

You thought you was smart, afew posts back.

Look where you are at now..?

It is over mate, you need to stop posting now mate.:hi:

 

I'm just having some fun.

"Laughing at your boring act"

I think you should go back to your other troll accounts. :hi:

 

Everything Teddy Atlas says here is right...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm59K0sB5Sg&feature=player_embedded[/ame]


When Hopkins faces Chad Dawson, he's facing a boat with a sail in it, with the preparation Manny Stewart will conduct, and the pure physical and technical skills Dwason has. Felix Trinidad, Kelly Pavlik, Jean Pascal, all of them are boats........."But without sails".

Bernard Hopkins last great win, was against Antonio Tarvar, and even Tarvar was complety ****ed physically.

When Bernard Hopkins faces Chad Dawson, its over.

You can only bull**** boxing for so long.