Carl Froch "Dirrell´s weak"

He's a known liar. Not surprised he took what Dirrell said out of context.

 

Once Froch loses to Ward he should fight Froch. That'll be a perfect comeback fight.

 

How would he manage that? :yep

 

Maybe when Froch beats Ward, Dirrell / Ward may finally happen

 

Froch has no chance of beating Ward. Sorry.

 

Remember watching it having Dirrell the winner,and i had it by a few rounds,take away one for the point,which was harsh.

In the 9th and 10th,Dirrell was teeing off on Froch, if only he had started earlier.

Froch barely landed a punch all night.

Froch couldnt land because Dirrell was running???

TOUGH ****!!!!. learn to close the ring down better!

 

He closed it down well enough to land more punches and win the fight.

 

Well he beat Dirrell and Pascal at first time of asking which Hopkins couldnt do and beat Taylor at first ask which Hopkins couldnt do twice.
You can say he lost to Kessler who Ward beat but that wouldnt tell how Froch wasnt able to get into a country then have to do a long car journey for a fight he thought was cancelled. The luxury of being a home fighter. Froch lost away and Ward hasnt proven himself away in a big fight.
If Ward fought in a world title fight in Europe he would end up like the other American SMWs that tried fighting in the tough European market and there is many, Taylor, Lacy, Sheika, Manfredo, Mitchell, Dirrell, to name a few

 

That's not what you saw, that what you were told and that is just sad. There is no way your own eyes told you that.

Makes me think about political debates, where the post debate shows tell you who they want you to think did good, while hardly mentioning the one who actually made the most sense.

Like I said. 5 Clean power shots upstairs to +40. How anyone saw the airball flurry thrower winning that is beyond me (and scoring criteria).

 

Is that what you thought af watching the fight???

 

Dirrell got robbed and Pascal is a 4 round fighter. Froch has no chance against Ward sorry.

 

edit

 

I'm not going to- out of spite.

 

I didn't take anything out of context. If Dirrell thinks he won, fine, and, like I said, if anyone else thinks he won, that's also fine. My point was that even Dirrell knows he did things wrong and it was a close fight, which contradicts with what you say. Everyone involved on Dirrell's side, including his team and promoter, admit that he should have done more to win yet he didn't. That's why they accept he lost the fight. If they disagree with the decision, then that's entirely fine. I have no issues with that. My issue is with what you say when you claim it was so one sided it was a robbery to give it to Froch or the fact you can't even conceive Dirrell losing the bout. That's something I disagree with and it's also something Dirrell himself disagrees with.

Like I said, you can try and twist what I said because it proves you wrong but everyone who has read what I actually said, knows what I meant.

 

Post your "close" scorecard. I will show you why anything other then a clear points win for Dirrell is laughable.