is pac a ped user or a cherrypicker?

i am getting confused with the inconsistencies of the pac haters in this board.

WHICH IS WHICH?

a. PAC dominates his opponents because all of them are damaged goods and leftovers

b. PAC dominates his opponents because he is using PEDS

c. PAC dominates because his opponents just wanna cash out and took a dive.

d. BOTH a and b

e. all of the above

 

Pac is clean

 

Pac is Count Pacula. He drains all opponents. All his 58 fights were catchweights.

 

you forgot beneficiary of fixed fights.

 

damaged goods / leftovers / catch weights.

99% winning formula right there.

 

You forgot how to read.

 

pac has been known to be a power puncher even before he went to welterweight. the only catchweight that i think he gets an advantage was against hoya. cotto was not weight drained he said it himself. margo of course is not weight drained. he has been a welterweight all his career and 150 is just okay for him.

leftovers? in pacs campaign as a welterweight, most of the top dogs are coming off loses and has loses. who do you think he should fight? the undefeated one has no interest of fighting him. the hatian undefeated one is too green for him.

damaged goods? does one knock out loss will damage a fighter? hence khan is a damaged fighter too and so is pacquiao when he got knocked out twice.

 

belongs to choice c. just wanna cash out and will took a dive.

 

a cherrypeder...

 

so you dont believe on the mayweathers PEDS accusations then:yep

 

O)lympic S)tyle D)ucking T)echnique

 

The title only gives us only two options so:

According to Pac, he doesn't know what steroids are, so the process of elimination leaves with the only other viable option: he's a cherry picker.

Suspicious cherrypicker at that.

 

exactly, it doesn't add up.

 

both. he's on peds and fighting old, shot and tailor-made fighters. that's a deadly combination and is why he looks so spectacular. p>

 

This.