http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/sunsport_columnists/article2395099.ece READ THAT LINK I remember Froch was calling out Calzaghe after roughly his 14th fight. People forget that Frank ****** has always maintained when question (despite massively falling out with Calzaghe) that Froch was offered good money to fight Calzaghe ahead of Sakio Bika. Froch would of had about 19 fights at the time and would have been a little bit green but at the end of the day he talked enough **** that he could at least try and back it up. The reality is if Calzaghe had of fought Froch instead of Hopkins he would have won a wide decision and Froch wouldn't have gotton the oppourtunities he has and would have eventually lost motivation and been cast a side as being a Mario Veit (Veit is very under rated btw) by the Yanks. Froch can shut up about Calzaghe ducking him, he had his chance to make the fight.
Oh, give it a rest. There's some right bull**** posted on this website. "FROCH DUCKED CALZAGHE", is that some sort of witty twist considering Froch called him out for ages? >The Sun That'd be about right. Stop reading a **** tabloid website/paper.
Why does Frank ****** maintain to this day when interviewed that he offered Froch the fight ahead of Bika. Don't give me all of this rubbish that Froch called him out because he was given a chance to back it up. I've no dought that at the time Froch fought Pascal he would have taken the fight but he didn't fancey it. Even after Calzaghe moved up Froch was saying let's make the fight but it'll have to be at a catch weight .
Why would ****** lie about this? He had a massive fall out with Calzaghe before that article was printed?
Why can't you type promoter Frank ******'s surname on here? Frank ******, of Sports network promotions.
Iceferg is one of the worst posters on this forum I have recently realized. This thread contains no "proof" of anything, other than his status as a General Forum joke figure.