The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

I never guarenteed that. I gave an educated guess that I felt it would happen. Obviously I can't see into the future. Here though, we're talking about the law. It's two entirely different scenarios.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhOff5HTRdw[/ame]

 

yes, you ARE a moron because don't believe he has a 'shot'.

that's just blatant floyd nuthugging.

loyal even to the end.:yep

if he didn't have a shot why did oscar SETTLE and will not discuss the case any further?:think:yep

 

Floyd Jr. apologized to Manny Pacquiao before, he can do it again.

This time maybe Roger will do it first then Floyd Sr. then Jr. will say that his father and uncle urge and force him to apologize.

 

don't worry, floyd litigation apology youtube vid will be in order. and it won't be as smug as this one..:rofl

 

**** No.
**** Pac.

 

Floyd should apologize to his fans for stealing all their money.

 

:thumbsup
Floyd- "Whether you paying to see me lose or to see me win, you still paying"

 

I'd be very interested to see if there was any financial settlement. Arum made it clear that he wouldn't work with GBP unless they apologized to Pacquiao. It was costing them fights and fighters. Mayweather doesn't have to worry about that. You can call it nuthugging if you want, but the law is not in Pacquiao's favor. It's pretty hard for a public figure to win a defamation of character suit. Usually, the people who win these suits are non public figures who are suing former employers that trashed them. This in turn prohibits them from gaining future employment elsewhere.

Pacquiao is a public figure who is suing a peer based off of insinuations of PED usage. He's doing this despite suffering no apparent damages. We'll see what happens, but I stand by my opinion on this. I took a lot of heat from Mosley fans as well when I said that his lawsuit wouldn't work out for him.

 

arum made it clear? the dude changes face more than michael jackson.

arum's word means ****.

why would you be curious how much money they settled with? when you settle, its basically saying you're guilty without the guilty connotation.

remember, the vegas economy does well when pac fights. you can be sure the judges take this **** into consideration even though they shouldn't.

 

Not how much, but whether or not there was a cash settlement. The fact of the matter is, a non cash settlement is basically the same thing as Pacquiao dropping the lawsuit. It's a game of semantics. When you don't have a case, you drop it. When you have a case, you have a cash settlement.

 

Screw the apology, just fight Pac with regular boxing rules(the same rules he agreed on in his entire professional career minus the Mosley fight) and that's more than enough.

 

He should apologize IF he is sorry. An apology means things on the surface, but they are pointless if you, deep down inside, are not genuine. So no, I don't think he should apologize (once again, if he doesn't feel sorry).

 

Why should floyd apologize for? that he said manny is on drugs witch is may be true since manny says he will not take floyds drug test?

 

no need to apolagize.....just fight.