Has Floyd's cowardice opened the door for every ***** in boxing to cry "PEDs!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kittikasem, Jun 1, 2011.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004
    Does that mean there's NOW DOUBT on those already in the Hall? They weren't tested. PED's aren't new. :deal
     
  2. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007

    the fukk you talkin about?

    i didnt say that...all i said was if your clean....there is nothing to worry about
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004
    OK, so they DO drug test in boxing? :huh
     
  4. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007

    at a loss of words for you.....
     
  5. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,451
    6,112
    Oct 5, 2009
    well now that opens up an entirely new and different debate

    and sure some of the guys already in may be juicers im trying to think of who could be

    but i think right now the current era with all the steroid technology and advances its more likely that current guys use them more so then guys from the past

    i say anybody from late 80s to early 90s could be suspicious but without any real evidence im not gonna point fingers

    certainly people will wonder when holyfield is up for induction
     
  6. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    pac stated his reason why he wants a cut-off, he said he does not want another morales-type of blood test which was done so close to the fight that it weakened his arm. but he agreed to give urine samples everyday and to undergo blood and urine test right after the fight. That blood testing procedure suggested by Pac is still stricter than any regular doping test policy of any athletic commission in america today. anyone who says pac does not want to be tested is a brainless ***** who does not know the details of the negotiation.

    And to think that pac with everything to lose and almost nothing to gain would still attempt to cheat in a window of two weeks is just idiotic. At two weeks there is hardly any benefit a ped can do especially when the training is already winding down, and the threat of getting caught by the everyday urine test and the blood test right after the fight is too much.

    again, to address floyd's sincerity about cleaning up the sport. Pac already agreed to do the OSDT in various recent interviews, why is Floyd pretending that these interviews do not exist? why did he deny that there was a second negotiation and continue to refuse to negotiate again?
     
  7. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    ***** vs ******* thread! Damn! I'll be back. Gotta work first...
     
  8. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Obviously yes.

    Look at Pascal, mother****er is a douche.

    "Take the test, take the test, take the test." These idiots are acting like a 5 year old bully.
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004

    Which is it. Do they, or do they NOT drug test in boxing.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004
    I can't argue with that. But if they don't ever impement a new testing. Then Pac's legacy is no more tarnished then those already enshrined in the Hall. :deal
     
  11. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    they do

    and like i said...if your clean....there is nothing to worry about

    so where do we go from here Lance...cus i have yet to see the point your making.
     
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004

    OK. so they do test. Don't worry, my point is coming. Sometimes it take a couple posts to finalize. :D

    So, even you admitted they test. Can we assume most are clean then? I mean, other then those on the very cheap, easy to find, undetectable designer drugs that leave no paper trail at all? :think

    I am just tired of most of those on the who insist most boxers are cheats even though they DO test boxers.

    That doesn't mean I think everyone is clean. But where are all the guys betting killed because their opponent was on roids? Or even those just getting beaten WORSE then they normally should? :huh
     
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Hate the playas not the game.

    Lil Floyd was just trying to clean the sport.
     
  14. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    Here is my thing...i never said anyone was on anything. Is this shyt fare to Pac...hellllll no. But thats just life man...he got pitched a curved ball, problem is...he struck the fukk out with the way he handled the shyt.

    To me PEDs issue is really irrelevant because like i said if your clean and someone comes yelling about taking a got damn test.....if your clean what the fukk are you worried about? Just take the damn test clear your name from the bullshyt and move on.

    I just dont see the harm in taking a test you know you will pass to clear your name. This is our society man....yes we have the saying innocnet till proven guilty....but do we really live by that in society...no we don't. You think OJ is innocent? Don't you believe there are actual innocent people locked up? Innoncent till proven guilty is a fairy tale....in our day and age you need to prove innocence....it harsh and fukked up but thats life as we know it.
     
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    I think you got a small dick (no homo)

    You can convince the whole ESB that that is not true by posting a pciture of your weiner with the name "igotJUIC3" beside it.

    Now you have the burden to clear your name :lol:

    If you have "nothing to hide", there should not be any problem for you to prove us all wrong, right?

    I'll wait for the pix (again no homo :twisted: )