Mike Tyson vs Evander Holyfield in 1991

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sportofkings, Oct 2, 2010.

  1. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,129
    Likes Received:
    4,069
    Negative.

    1988 = noway.

    1991 = mmmm...nah.
     
  2. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    55
    Tyson would have won. He had sen better days. This had more to mentaly than physicaly but was still the best heavyweight around. He should have gotten a rematch with Douglass. He would have won and should have fought Holyfield sooner than they were schulded to as the champion.
    Holyfield was real god but also to brave for his own good.
    I see a competive fight but Tyson in the lead going into the 10th and what would be the last round.
     
  3. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,028
    Likes Received:
    119
    Holyfield Always beats Tyson.
     
  4. mochabuzz

    mochabuzz Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    85
    Tyson Tko within 10. Holyfield would trade with Tyson & get ktfo.
     
  5. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    7
    Holy late tko, slightly ahead on pts. He got caught by Cooper coz he wasn't on. Against Mike he would have left no stone unturned and Mike, although always dangerous, was already past his best. Tyson rocks him but can't finish him.
     
  6. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    7
    The Tyson of the Spinks fight beats Holy, probable late stoppage.
     
  7. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think the incredible prime Tyson myth gets a bit overrated. Someone like Holyfield could have exposed him at any point in his career. He went into prison a young man and came out a young man. It's not like he was inside for a decade is it?
     
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    15,280
    Likes Received:
    254
    Always, always.
     
  9. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,129
    Likes Received:
    4,069


    :think..........:nono
     
  10. crippet

    crippet Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,377
    Likes Received:
    20

    Is that a typo? :yep
     
  11. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    28,283
    Likes Received:
    473
    Ive posted an article on here, there is a thread about it somewhere.
    Holyfield himself stated he didnt know how a fight in 91 would have gone.

    No Tyson was not in for a decade, but 3 years out of your sport WILL affect you and Tyson was looking finished during the Ruddock fights according to most commentators. Bowe was finished by 96, Holyfield was though of as washed up in 96, why was Tyson thought of as still in his prime even though he turned pro and done it all before them???

    He turned pro in 85 and 10 years later was coming out prison....hardly a young man in career terms. Especially a fighter with his style of boxing.
    Its not like he was a tall fighter like Ali, Lewis, Holmes or Vitali, who could just lean back and rely on their jabs
     
  12. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    28,283
    Likes Received:
    473
    Oh BTW, Tyson beats Holyfield in 1991
     
  13. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    20,862
    Likes Received:
    139
    You only have to look at Holyfields fights leading up to the second fight with Bowe to see how Holy would have fought Tyson. He wouldnt have fought him like he did in 96, its a fact. It would have been a slugfest, and Tyson had bigger bombs at this time. Holy would have been game, but he probably would have been stopped, he just couldnt hold himself back when someone wanted to trade with him. In 96, he had to look for spots to rest and hold, because he could no longer fight at the same pace. Holyfield had an iron grip on Tyson and looked to hold after every exchange.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    15,280
    Likes Received:
    254
    Thats debatable. You could say that because Holyfield knew Tyson was such a dangerous puncher, he would have adjusted accordingly, even though he did trade with Foreman, etc. It could also be that Holyfield getting into a war with Tyson might have sapped some belief out of Tyson as well. It's hard to tell.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    20,862
    Likes Received:
    139
    If Holyfield ever showed me he was a disciplined fighter I would agree with you. Holyfield did understand his limitations in the mid 90's very well and I attribute that to his work with Tommy Brooks.
    At this time though Holy was fighting stupid with everyone. I mean it doesnt get any more limited and crude than Bert Cooper, and Cooper still put Holy on his ass.