How would Pacquiao have done against Hagler/Hearns/Lenoard/Duran?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kragz, Jun 2, 2011.


  1. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    I'm intrigued, after hearing Teddy Atlas say that Pacman isn't even a top 25 ATG I was wondering how he would do in this era. I personally think he'd probably be too fast and strong for hagler, but would lose to Leonard and Hearns.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    Looses to Leonard via wide UD or KO, looses to Hearns by KO. If we are assuming Hagler is at his prime weight of 160 then Hagler ****ing murders him. And if Duran was at his prime weight of 135 he wins via UD or KO. Duran at 147? Tough to say, if it was the Duran in the first fight with Leonard, he would beat Pac as well.
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :patsch log off
     
  4. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    If you had a decent amount of posts I'd reply. I'm sorry if you are a new member.
     
  5. brassgod

    brassgod Active Member Full Member

    672
    0
    Mar 12, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  6. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    the worst style for him is hearns but he was not that effective till he moved up past 154 so at Welter Manny would have no problems with a drained Hitman. Manny would eat SRL and Hagler alive with his right hook. Jim 117-111 Manny Pacquiao, he just landed the cleaner harder punches.
     
  7. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    I'm a new member. Is that why the response i got was from somebody who google queried "funny old pictures"?
     
  8. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Pac would probably beat them all because he'd only fight them coming off losses or horrible performances and most of those guys didn't have really bad performances until quite late in their careers.

    But seriously, those are some of the best fighters in history, prime or close to prime, they all beat his ass.
     
  9. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    I'm fairly new but on other forums I get similar responses when people just don't want to say they don't know what they're talking about.
     
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    can you start watching another sport.
     
  11. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    I don't know. This site has a lot of posters who register lots of user accounts and support their own threads with them. That's all I'm saying mate.
     
  12. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    **** me. Some people are delusional.
     
  13. Sean Juan

    Sean Juan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,600
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Thats just false. Hearns was a killer at welterweight. Ask Pepino Cuevas. He was more respected as a pro than Leonard BEFORE they fought.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,119
    78,387
    Nov 30, 2006
    Too...strong...and...fast...for...Hagler? :blood


    This content is protected
     
  15. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    and they say Floyd fans are worse than this??????????????:bart