How would Pacquiao have done against Hagler/Hearns/Lenoard/Duran?

Manny Pacquiao destroys them all by KO. If he fights them today. ahahahahahahahaha. In the 80's. He looses to all of them unless he demands a ridiculous catchweight.

 

Big Trouble in Little China :good

 

Join date: Dec 2010

Posts: 5


Obvious troll alt account. ***** pretending to be a real stupid ******* to make them look worse.

 

Explain...Exactaclown then?

 

Too fast and strong for a top 5 atg middleweight?

Good god - theinsanity doesn't stop.

 

too strong for Hagler? atsch i stopped reading there

kill yourself noob

 

Never post here again *******.

 

So lets get this straight. You don't agree?

 

Prime Pac easily dominates and beats all of those bums in the same night...

 

:rofl

 

Even as a massive Pacquiao fan, I think it's obvious he'd lose to all four. Hagler vs Pacquiao is a mismatch, a non-starter, a joke, considering Pac has never and will never fight at high as 160. Hearns and Leonard are both natural welters and much bigger than Pac, and both would have too much firepower for him at 147. The Duran of the SRL and Palomino fights at 147 is also one of the greatest fighting machines of all-time, and even though his size advantages wouldn't be as great as the other three, he'd still have way too much inside skill for Manny and would stop him in the mid-late rounds.

 

hard to say b/c all these men are bigger than PAC aside from Duran, but all similar in term of their ability and talents. By far PAC has never faced anyone like Hearns, Hagler, Duran or Leonard during his era, but based on PAC's dominance in a very solid one, I'd say he could compete and even beat some of them if they were at 140 or 147. I think Hagler and hears are just too big with the right style. Leonard and Duran I think PAC has the best chance at beating if he could at all.

 

:rofl

 

atsch Troll....

 

METH is a helluva drug!!!