A thread asking for opinions on WANDERLEI SILVA and CHUCK LIDDELL

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by Kittikasem, Jun 8, 2011.


  1. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    Two answers each please gentlemen.



    Question 1: Who was the better fighter in terms of ability/skillset/effectiveness at their respective peaks, Wanderlei Silva or Chuck Liddell?

    For me, the best Wanderlei ever was the guy who wrecked prime Rampage Jackson in their 1st fight, in the Pride MW GP Final of 2003. In the year leading up to this fight, Wandy had fought Cro-Cop to a draw, and knocked out Sakuraba. A year later, he would defeat Rampage again.

    For me, the best Chuck ever was the guy who knocked out Randy Couture in the 1st round of their rematch in 2005. The previous year, he'd knocked out Tito Ortiz, and the following year he'd go on to stop both Couture and Ortiz again.

    Who was the superior fighter between these two?




    Question Two: Who had the greater career, who do you rank higher in ATG terms, who was pound-for-pound the greater fighter between Wanderlei Silva and Chuck Liddell?



    Silva first won the Pride MW Title in 2001 from Kazushi Sakuraba, he won the Pride MW GP in 2003 defeating Sakuraba and Rampage Jackson en route, and he didn't lose the MW Title until he was beaten by Dan Henderson in 2007.

    His best wins include: Dan Henderson, Kazushi Sakuraba, Rampage Jackson, Ricardo Arona, and arguably Michael Bisping as this was achieved when many had written Wanderlei off as a shot fighter.

    His significant losses include: Losses to much bigger men in Mark Hunt and Mirko Cro-Cop, a KO loss to Dan Henderson, and being outpointed by Ricardo Arona (a defeat which was avenged).

    Record: 33-10-1-1 (23 KO wins, 4 KO/TKO losses)




    Liddell first won the UFC LHW Title in 2005 when he knocked out Randy Couture to avenge a loss, and made 4 successful defences (Horn, Couture, Sobral, Ortiz) before losing it by KO to Rampage Jackson in 2007.

    His best wins include: Randleman, Belfort, Overeem, Ortiz and Couture. He also holds a points win over Wanderlei, though it can be argued that the UFC Wanderlei was not the same fighter as the peak Pride version.

    His significant losses include: Stopped by Randy Couture and twice knocked out by Rampage Jackson.

    Record: 21-8 (13 KO wins, 6 KO losses)





    Please vote and comment :bbb
     
  2. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Hmmm tough question, both did their best, and by that I mean most brutal, stand up performances against grapplers. But the difference for me is Wandy faced strikers who were as good if not better than him in PRIDE, all be it later in his run in Japan. Chuck with a few exceptions of course, was just ktfo of grapplers with his immense TD defence and right hand combo. But for all roundedness and level of comp, Id give it to Wandy overall even though I think Chucks style is all wrong for him if they fought in their primes, and they were not too far removed from it when they did

    But for me, the Page fight and Wandy fighting Mirko Hunt and Fujita, legit HW's who he went 2 2 with just edges it form me

    HTH - Chuck
    Overall - Wanderlei
     
  3. Anarchy99

    Anarchy99 Babalu will KILL You! Full Member

    2,726
    0
    Feb 2, 2011
    A well thought out thread my friend. You did your research and I nominate this for MMA thread of the year. I also vote overall career is Silva but H2H is Chuck.
     
  4. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    Thanks mate, good read :good
     
  5. greathamza

    greathamza Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,652
    1
    Feb 14, 2011
    their first match didnt end in a KO loss to chuck it was a corner stoppage
     
  6. Anarchy99

    Anarchy99 Babalu will KILL You! Full Member

    2,726
    0
    Feb 2, 2011
    KO, TKO...wtf is the difference.
     
  7. greathamza

    greathamza Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,652
    1
    Feb 14, 2011
    that the dude wasnt knocked out is the difference :good
     
  8. Primate

    Primate Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,833
    6
    Nov 16, 2010
    Wanderlei.

    Now fighting as a middleweight, the guy went to war with heavyweights and looked good doing it. Went 2-1 against Rampage and that loss came well past his prime. He's still been competitive in his recent losses, including to Chuck (a fight which I think would've gone very differently if they were both in their prime) and Franklin, even though he's a fraction of what he used to be, and the Bisping fight showed that he still has what it takes to be competitive (and win) at a high level.
     
  9. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    I'm a big fan of both but Chuck was better head to head and had a better record aside from the Rampage fights. But were Chuck lost to Rampage and Wanderlai didn't - Chuck crushed Tito Ortiz where Wanderlai lost to him. Chuck beat multiple former UFC champions. I don't think Wanderlai had a single one on the winning side of his resume.
     
  10. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ahem, prime Sakuraba twice, Henderson and Rampage twice in his unbeaten run from 2000-2004, split decision loss to prime Mark Hunt and a draw with prime Cro Cop in that period too.

    Chuck is undeniably a scary and awesome champion, but I personally rank Silva over him.
     
  11. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Two similar fighters in that they had KO power and always looked to finish fights and were obviously technically flawed , thats the beauty of these two is that you could always see them being beaten but in there primes it didnt happen .

    My thoughts are that Wanderlei was the more polished skill wise , and Chuck will stand above him in an ATG list , but ive gotta say this , theres **** all between them in both departments .

    My one gripe with Wanderlei is that he was abusing PED's as were most of the Pride fighters in that era , that for me massively reduces Wanderlie's credibility , we never seen the monster that was in Pride in the UFC and i solely beleive that Wanderlei's style whilst in Pride and the manner he applied himself in the ring was partially down to steroids .

    Id always go with Liddell in a fantasy match up between these two as i beleive Chucks style and reach was / would of been the major factor in him beating Wanderlei , added to that Chuck always has his wrestling to go to if the stand up wasnt going great , hence round 3 of there fight @UFC 79

    My overall summary of Chuck would be a decent striker , who was game , athletically gifted with tremendous power and in his prime excellent timing , he was matched well during his reign as the sports leading figure but for me he was never the striker he was made out to be , and once his chin went so did he , Liddell at his very best in MMA was his fight with Belfort IMHO , yes he had solid displays against Randy and Tito oh and Babalu but other than that there's nothing that special in terms of resume when you look at todays monsters , that said , in his time he was the best in the world , that is without doubt
     
  12. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    So Wandy was definitely on steroids throughout his time in Pride??
     
  13. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    It was horse meat...
     
  14. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    I went for Wanderlay on both counts. But it hurt to go against Chuck. I've always loved watching the guy. The closest thing to a pub carpark streetfighter you'll see in the octagon.
     
  15. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Right on Spider - Both men were awesome and to be thanked for bringing scary striking to the fore when Matt Hughes and Sherk were l'n'p-ing all over dudes.