I meet some people from London, and i was wondering if they support Haye, well, it was a wrong questions to ask. They say that Haye will absolutely destroy Wlad, like Wlad have no chance at all, they speaking about Haye as hes a ****ing superstar boxer that cant be touched at all. Is he really that good?! No hate just discuss :huh
British people are the most mind controlled in the world. The USA will stand up to their government, the germans will and even the french will but we won't. We're told free trade is good. We're told we don't need a manufacturing industry. We're told outsourcing labour to india is great. We're told the banks 'needed bailing out'. We were told the olympics were great for the economy. We're told we're tolerant. We're told giving billions in taxpayer aid to countries like india during a recession is good. And we're told by the media David Haye is a great champion. .............feels good to be british sometimes yessir.
The result of this fight won't be decided by who is the better fighter, I don't think. It's more about tactics than ability. I have no doubt that Wlad is the better fighter but I think he'll come into the fight with an inferior gameplan and that'll cost him the fight. It's a definite toss up though, mainly because of the chin and power of both men. Either could win with one right hand, so I can't be too bold about a prediction.
anyone who says either fighter doesn't have a chance is a fool. this fight can go either way. i'm picking haye to win, but know that he could be knocked out if he gets caught clean. i think haye's speed and power will be the deciding factor in this one. but to say wlad can't win this... just ridiculous.
look at this car washing manual labour working **** lying to make himself feel good on an internet discussion forum, you didn't meet anyone from london and no one said that.
The fights up in the air for me. If Haye shows he can in some way nullify the jab by getting inside or staying out of range and waiting for Wlad to make a mistake then we may have a tasty fight indeed and one that I'd pick Haye to win. If Haye can't then its game over. I couldn't really care about this fight any more than I do Cintron-Cotto or Guerrero-Rios but it certainly intrigues me because I can't make my mind up on how that scenario plays out. I favour Wlad at this point but...its up in the air.
You need to understand how SkySports has hyped David Haye up. I mean, his match versus Harrison was actually really anticipated by people who don't even follow boxing, thanks to SkySports. And that is why people talk about him like he is a superstar, because the same people that watch SkySports don't come onto this website or go searching on the internet for every bit of detail, so they believe him to be exactly what SkySpots tells them he is. And why do you bring attention to the fact that "British" people believe that? Trying to make the UK look stupid, just because some casual fans believe Haye to be more than he is?
This is what I don't understand. Why is a shamster like Haye more popular than a legit champion like Froch? By all rights, Carl should be MILES ahead of Haye based on his resume and credibility. Shame it doesn't appear to be the case.
Haye's defense is his legs. His offense is a potshot then out, then lunge in with an OH R. He drops L hand when leading with the R, and if Wlad counters ONE single Hayemaker, the fight is over right there. Hayes chin is wide open when he throws for power. I also don't think Wlads chin is weak to shots he sees coming. Haye telegraphs his shots. Look for an explosion by Haye in the first or second round, then Wlad to counter him, put him on his horse, then drop him with a right.
This will be Wlads easiest fight to date, he will win every round and KO Haye early, probably around 4 or 5. I was born in England but I don't just blindly follow athletes from my country, boxing is a world wide sport and I support many fighters from many nations.