Floyd vs Ortiz: Dan Rafeal "Deserves Credit... Froch "Its a Dangerous fight"

it will worst than mosley pac. no knockdowns and floyd will not trade.

ortiz is a limited fighter.26 year old c grade champion with a belt.

it will look like gatti all over again.

keep hyping the fight though..

nobody believes its gonna be a good fight. if floyd mayweather. he's never in a good fight. see his last 3 fights for details.

 

worse than pac-mosley???

 

At this rate you will be calling Ortiz a D grade fighter by tomorrow.
*******s mad cause every other fighter willing to fight Floyd will take the test without hesitation.

 

Nice duck of a question I asked you....very fitting. :roll:

 

Can't be any worse than Pac-Clottey or Pac-Mosley that's for damn sure.:rofl BTW you don't know **** about boxing calling Ortiz a C fighter. Do you even know how to rank fighters by grades?

 

:huh Can you explain WHY that would supposedly make Pac fans mad? NVm...

 

I didn't duck **** *******. The truth is you're just an irrational hater who would hate on his opponent no matter who he fought.:deal If he signed to fight Bradley you would say he should have fought Ortiz Bradley is too small. If he signed to fight Berto you would have said he's coming off a loss and he's ducking Ortiz the guy who beat him. Fittingly he signed to fight Ortiz so you say he's a nobody. You're too easy Lance.:deal

 

If...If...If....talk about the real world fanboy. You guys and your "ifs"...atsch

Yes, you blatantly ducked my question. You know you have NO consistency. Say what you want about me, at least I am consistent.

You change 'who's deserving" to fit your bill. That is an agenda. Margarito was TOTALLY undeserving, Ortiz is deserving...

 

no knockdowns, both guys look happy just to collect a paycheck..

don't be fooled by 'young and hungry'. that's just another fancy term for not talented and inexperienced.

remember its for some bogus 147 belt that victor happened to win.

not even good for boxing.

 

I guess you didn't see my answer post 60 in this thread? BTW you're ducking my question.:deal Who else should PBF have fought at 147 besides Pac?:hi:

 

This?

You moron...you were talking about how Margarito did Not deserve a fight. This doesn't answer why you are inconsistent with what 'deserve' mean to you. Jesus Christs...why do you have such a difficulty READING my posts? atsch You and the other Floyd fanboys ALWAYs did this ****. I say something, you assume I said something else.

 

Not any worse than the bogus belt Pac won from Cotto in their fight at 145 or any worse than the vacant title he won against Margo for the JMW title at a catchweigh of 150.

 

It works both ways. You seem to have a hard time answering my question of who should PBF have fought at 147 besides Pac?:hi:

 

#2 rated behind Pacquiao...

That's like being ranked behind UCLA during the 60s and 70's..:smoke

 

Are you ****in kidding me? You thnk you can just skirt away, NOT even give me an answer, then insist I answer you?

You claimed Margarito was never deserving of a fight w/ Floyd. Despite him having more wins over Ring Ranked WW's then anyone else. More then Judah, Floyd and Baldomor combined at the time. He's not worthy, but Ortiz, beating ONE guy (who was seen as protected) now make Ortiz worthy? atsch

Tell you what, just say Margarito WAS worthy of a title shot and that you were wrong. Or explain why it's different now. And I'd be more then happy to answer your question.