Calzaghe always beats Hopkins at any stage of their careers and here is the evidence

Ive owned you kittikasem on the messageboard just like Calzaghe owned Hopkins in the ring.

I expect you will be changing your username shortly ?

 

"Read it and weep":

:good

 

According to kittikasem Hopkins greatest ever win was against a career welterwight in Trindad, followed by Hopkins defeat to Joe Calzaghe {not very good for an ATG that, Hopkins greatest win was against a blown up welterweight when he was a middlweight and his second greatest win was a loss :nut}.

So kittikasem if it was one of Hopkins greatest ever performances against Joe Calzaghe, and Hopkins lost having put up such a great performance, how was Hopkins ever likely to beat Calzaghe ?, for the record it was one of Calzaghes worst ever performances against Hopkins.

Hopkins puts in a career best performance against Calzaghe.
Calzaghe puts in a career worst performance against Hopkins.
Yet Calzaghe wins quite easily {it would have taken a huge change around on one of the judges scorecards for Hopkins to have won}.

Therefore there is no way Hopkins ever beats Calzaghe during their active careers, they fought at a time of their careers and place and weight that all suited Hopkins, yet Hopkins still lost.

Calzaghe v Hopkins = Calzaghe win, everytime.

 

"Read it and weep":

:good

 

Oh i get it, no reasoned arguements, no answering questions just trolling, you can get banned for trolling you know.

 

"Read it and weep":

:good

 

Trolling on the classic forum, oh dear, if everybody behaved like you there would be no forum at all, copying and pasting the samething over and over, if everybody did that on every topic on every forum, the site would ground to a halt.

 

I have learned that the only way to get rid of a troll is to troll them relentlessly. You are the biggest troll on this forum without a shadow of a doubt (one glance at the threads you consistently produce is proof enough of this), therefore:


"Read it and weep":

:good

 

you are gay and dumb I take it, what word was not in English.

I know a lot of people that have been in prison and a few boxers that have went.

If you are a man you would not allow another man use your ass for recreation unless you liked it and that is your choice.

Now I am assuming you are at an age before puberty so some day you may understand.

A man will not be anyone's *****, even Emile Griffith who was gay had to give it he would not let anyone take it but Griffith like young men.

You are either a man or you are not and a man holds his ground.

 

I think he hurt B-hop and was getting to him and that is why Bernard faked getting hit low. Manny Stewart said Bernard is looking for a time out and I think it was to avoid the pressure and he was feeling Joe come on and wanted to stop his momentum. Why else would he pull the cheap trick. Joshua Clottey did the same against Miguel Cotto and for me it is the other fighter looking for a rest or a free point.

 

I agree that Hopkins was looking for a breather; thoroughly disagree that he was 'hurt' in any way shape or form. No way in hell did the lhw Calzaghe have the power to swat a fly, never mind inconvenience someone with the chin and resilience of Bernard Hopkins. And bear in mind, Calzaghe wasn't even landing much anyway! Nah, B-Hop needed a breather because he was 43 years old and in with a relentless buzzsaw of an opponent who never stopped chasing and throwing. That's the long and the short of it, and that's why a younger B-Hop with no stamina issues would have put Calzaghe to the sword in emphatic style IMO.

 

Im not about to bump your posts up kittikasem because they are ****, but you have done more Calzaghe posts this year alone than me {slagging off Calzaghe}, not to mention loads of Hopkins posts {praising Hopkins}, loads of Pretty Boy Mayweather posts {slagging off Mayweather} and loads of Pacman posts {praising Pacman}.

You have bumped up posts of mine from as far back as August 2009 .
You obviously love my posts , you are even copying my 'read it and weep' line .

If you want to participate in debate on the classic forum then fine, but dont troll by copying and pasting the same paragraph over and over again because you dont have the answers and have nothing more to contribute on a subject because you have been exposed, dont resort to nastiness and swearing, dont resort to not answering valid questions after replying to somebody elses thread in the first place.

You have just got a reputation under various aliases that you have used as being a hater, you will never command the respect of many posters on here until you put a balanced view forward.
What have i told you before in the past - saying Hopkins is great and Calzaghe is **** {same goes for saying Pacman is great and Mayweather is ****} does your views no favours on the classic forum as Hopkins, Calzaghe, Pacman and Mayweather are all great boxers and deserve respect.

You need to up your game and stop being so childish if you want to be seen as anything other than a hater on the classic, the best thing you can do is change your username yet again and start over again.
{but there again, you cant help yourself can you Dinamita, Pacfan84, Popkins, the hate and bad behaviour just shines through and we know who you are straight away}

 

A whole raft of quality threads man, you're Classic quality all right. :good

 

Try telling Dinamita aka Pacfan84 aka Popkins aka kittikasem that.

 

Nice of you to say so lefthook, I dont tend to correspond via pm's with posters but I did receive a nice pm the other day off somebody that has not contributed to this particular thread but liked the lead post very much.