why is haye's heavyweight resume separated from the rest...

when discussing in the GF (general forum) about adamek and haye the GF posters keep mentioning how adameks heavyweight resume is better therefore he is a better fighter.

this morning some idiot said robert helenius' heavyweight resume is better thats why he will beat haye.... WTF!?

 

I've looked into it and it seems that a high percentage of the users of the General Forum are massive spackers.

 

I don't think it's unreasonable to claim that Adamek's resume at HW is superior to Haye's.

Nor his cruiserweight one, to be perfectly honest.

 

but they include adameks cruiserweight wins to argue why he's better but with haye its "oh he's fought valuev, ruiz and fraudly at heavyweight".

 

So true.

 

And? They're all ******s. U.S.S is arguably better than Mormeck IMO, but still, no use in searching for logic with those ****wits mate :good

 

Not cool to call people spackers or mongs:bart











just kidding ******s

 

true, i dont know why i argue with those idiots, its good fun sometimes though.

one idiot claims haye is only half british and england has not had a proper champion except for hatton.

 

Regardless of the merits of Adameks record Haye would still **** him in the ring, so to speak

 

Let's be honest. The reason they give Haye **** is because 95% of the hardcore Adamek fans and 75% of the hardcore Klitschko fans are Eastern European or American white supremacists who cling to these guys as they don't want to cheer for non white fighters. The Polish are crazy racist.

 

:deal

 

Probably due to the fact that General Forum is biased against British fighters.

 

I dont really think wins over golota, mcbride, grant, arreola and maddalone are better
than Barrett, Ruiz, Valuev, Bonin and Harrison.

 

Gave up on the GF a long time ago.

 

yanks are just jealous they havnt got a hw champ....

pointless talking to them.

or how the yanks would say "we dont got"

****ing annoying talking twats.