ok. lets make it 2 lineals in a span of 5 divisions. any other fighter in your list can claim to the same besides armstrong and duran?
If you have placed Fitzsimmons in your list, then the list really isn't too hard to crack. I don't have him in my list. To me, although he dominated the contenders of the day, he still was in my mind, unproven. So, he doesn't make my list. I agree that Langford, Pep, and Ali are definitely unmovable top 10 placements, and both Leonard and Durand should be there. I believe that Hopkins knows very well what he is doing today. He isn't fighting for the money and knows what he has to do to enter that list of unmovable ATGs. We'll have to see how it all ends in 2-3 years for Hopkins. If I'm right, you may have a different opinion after reviewing his FUTURE record. :yep:good
That doesn't sound that impressive really. Really man. Langford started his career at light weight and fought at heavy weight and was knocking fools out. He never did get a title though, because of boxing politics. Bob Fitzsimmons won the heavyweight title at 160 pounds Just look at what these guys have done. Manny doesn't compare.
A question to the TS, who the **** say PacNard are both top ATG. Holy freaking Christ! PAC has to beat Floyd Sergio then kill Bradley and khan to make money before retiring for PAC to be even in the conversation for the top 10 in ATG rankings.... What's The point of this Thread? Isn't it obvious to everyone?
In all seriousness Floyd has to beat PAC Sergio then move up to Super Middle and beat Ward Froch then Bute before he'd be in the top 10 :rofl As of now Floyd would be lucky to break top 40 :thumbsup
chill the hell out. This was why I included his name [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=305331[/url] [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=313806[/url]
:smooch some people get it twisted. I'm not an extreme ***** thinking Manny is an amateur and Floyd is GOAT. I can be fair, but I'm just very vocal so people see my a lot an assume I'm one of the worst
Its a stupid thread just like p4p ranking of current fighters is stupid. A fighter needs to be completely defined. Meaning they need to be retired and fighters they fight need to be retired before you can compare them with other ATG fighters. A fighter is defined by who he faces in the ring and what he does And sometimes fighters they don't face in the ring becomes a factor.