The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

:good I can tolerate some *******s and I'm cool with a lot of them, but I can't stand the Goros, OnePunchKos, Egoylover, fister type. It's funny because OnePunchKo is the most knowledgeable person out of that group.

And to the guys dissing the article and think he's leaving out stuff on purpose. Please add anything he's missing and add a source. Also and add stuff from the time zone he's talking about. He hasn't put the time line up for the second negotiation yet

 

I'm talking about the article posted in this thread. Not some loon going off on the net like in the vid you posted. Stick to the topic at hand.:deal

 

You got real evidence to show this time or just some weak ass articles?:huh

 

The artcle is better evidennce than that gayass video you just posted. It is backed up with 3rd party sources.

 

here is a timeline that matters.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Contract Proposed for Manny Pacquiao vs. Floyd Mayweather Jr. in March

This content is protected

by Associated Press on Dec 2, 2009 5:17:52 PM
LAS VEGAS -- Promoter Bob Arum flew Wednesday to the Philippines with a proposed contract for a March 13 fight between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr.

This content is protected

Still, the fact Arum would make the trip to the Philippines to try and get his fighter to sign for the bout was an indication that the megafight was moving forward. It would match the two fighters regarded as the best pound-for-pound in the world in a bout at 147 pounds.
......................................
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=4715684

This content is protected

Source: Pacquiao agrees to 50-50 split


By Dan Rafael
ESPN.com

Manny Pacquiao has signed a contract to fight Floyd Mayweather Jr. in boxing's biggest fight on March 13, a source with knowledge of the meeting told ESPN.com on Friday night.

This content is protected

Mayweather

This content is protected

Pacquiao


Pacquiao and promotor Bob Arum met for two hours Friday to discuss the proposed deal, according to Pacquiao adviser Michael Koncz, who told The Associated Press that "Manny has some additional requirements, requests, which Arum didn't think was a problem.

"The requests of Manny were so realistic that Arum doesn't feel it's a problem and it's pretty much a done deal," Koncz said.
Later Friday it became a done deal, at least on the Pacquiao side, when he signed the paperwork, the source said
................................................
http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/index.ssf/2009/12/floyd_mayweather_representativ.html

Floyd Mayweather's representatives demand Olympic-style drug testing for Pacquiao fight

Published: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 6:55 PM Updated: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 10:09 PM

This content is protected

By

This content is protected

The Grand Rapids Press

This content is protected

This content is protected

Floyd MayweatherIn a highly unconventional move, representatives of Floyd Mayweather are demanding that both their fighter and Manny Pacquiao be subjected to random, Olympic-style drug testing in the weeks leading up to their proposed March 13 fight.

Leonard Ellerbe, Mayweather’s adviser, declined to comment whether the demand was based on suspicions, initially voiced by Floyd Mayweather Sr., and subsequently by others close to Mayweather, that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs.

This content is protected

..............................................

 

What a pointless question. :roll:

 

We're all passed that. But dwell on it if you think it's a major point. YOu seem to be the only one.

 

I thought the drug testing was on the table since day one:huh
I've seen multiple people say that.

You may be right though, I'm not calling you a liar or wrong, it's just I was told otherwise

 

Dude what do you consider "facts", I mean you've posted absolutely nothing other than your biased, sarcastic, opinions...how about you provide some sort of validation for your argument, as opposed to being a dick all the time.

 

These timelines are hilarious

 

your turn to show proof....and I added links to the articles in my post.

 

Much ado for nothing. All this time line discussion and argument means nothing and proves nothing if the root of the problem is not pointed out. Cause and effect, it's that simple. What caused all this bruhaha, in the first place? Who put on an unreasonable demand/prerequisite in the negotiation table that ultimately caused its breakdown? That's the most important question that needs to be answered. Not "who says what when?" nor is it "who compromised more to the other? nor who's telling the truth and who's lying?"

 

Are you even aware of what I've been talkking about? atsch If you want to question something specific I've said, then do so. None of your blanket statements please. WHat FACT is you want to ask me about?

 

Off topic Khans entrance SONG.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6JmvR2yMtU[/ame]

 

I don't know why *******s and *****S still arguing about this whole ****ing nonsense of a fight that ain't happening. Take the test this he's a coward that. Floyd won't fight Pac period. Give it a ****ing rest good God!