Fat Peter almost got a UD since he knocked him down 3 times. Given Wlad's fragile heart, he usually doesn't get up even when he goes down from not being hit.
This is how big aggressive fighters with no chin have done against Wladimir! [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZckm2aPOpE[/ame]
This content is protected To settle your curiosity, the answer is yes Fundamentally Wlad is better than Vitali. Good jab and power but here is the thing you have missed WLAD BOXES LIKE A ROBOT He is conditioned and primed to keep smaller opposition on the end of a long jab then throw a huge straight right right behind it so that the boxer doesn't see it coming. What else does he have!!!?? Uppercuts? Body shots? Headmovement?? The answer is NO You're the type of poster who thinks Manny Pacquiao is the GOAT. I bet you do think this don't you. He fight mediocre opposition and looks great doing it, therefore he is awesome. I've already put a list down of boxers who would smash Wlad We have seen Wlad in the trenches and I'm afraid to say he has failed. Would you ever see Joe Loius struggle with Peter? Would you ever see Schmelling struggle with Brewster? Would you ever see Fraizer struggle with sanders The answer is NO You can not rule the weakest heavyweight division of ALL TIME and tell me you're an ATG heavyweight. Yes he is good but the c**p opposition he faces makes him look invincible. If Wlad was Haye's size he wouldn't even get a title shot in this division at the moment So don't lecture me on Wlad like you know what you're talking about. He will be known for not fighting a genuine great heavyweight when he retires, and for having a glass chin.
I think Greg Page would win a wide UD against Wlad, Tony Tubbs would mesmermize Klitschko with his bouncing man-titties while sticking and moving to the tune of 120-108. In fact, any mediocre boxer from the 90's and all decades previous would pick Wlad apart, those eras were that good and this one is that bad. The 80's had guys like Berbick and Pinklon, monsters roamed the scene back then.
For christ sake, have you ever seen the fella? Wlad is to much of an athlet to lose to someone like Cooney. Quit trolling.
Boxers from glorified eras for some strange reason are all ranked as ATG's in som fans opinions, and since they lost and defeated each other that means they all have ATG's on their resume and only lost to other ATG's. Forget about resume and look at it head to head. Skill, power, size, athletisism, condition, ring intelligence. I believe that many of the names of that list belongs to boxers that where to small and to sluggish to go the distance with Wlad. Not only would they lose, they would be KO'd.
Tough to "UD" Wlad. That means he would have to last the 12 rounds to be UD'ed. Most of the better heavies would starch him inside of 10 rather than carry him 12. Not bashing Wlad, just saying there's 20-30 ATGs that would eat his lunch.
Patterson and Ezzard Charles and jersey Joe walcott would not have beaten wlad . Joe Frazier would have walked through him and though I cant imagine Dempsey UD'ing Wlad if he didnt KO him early - Wlad would take a terrific beating on the inside on the way to a narrow points win.