Who was the more effective 'swarmer - Joe Frazier or Rocky Marciano ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Jun 23, 2011.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,464
    9,342
    Jul 17, 2009
    Fighters who were similar in some ways,but hardly identical.
     
  2. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Mariciano. His defensive skills to setup his shots are pretty underated.
     
  3. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,261
    2,477
    Mar 26, 2005
    Marciano....Constant pressure...great chin...power in both hands...especially the"Suzie Q"
     
  4. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    505
    Jan 28, 2007
    Marciano. I think he expended his energy a bit more wisely. He got pretty much the same results with less movement and seemed to have more energy at the end that was ready to use.

    Frazier closed the gap quicker, however.
     
  5. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Marciano
    -Genuine two handed puncher unlike Joe
    -Huge workrate
    -broke down a wide range of more skilled boxers
    -Huge KO PCT
    -Knockouts from 1 punch and accumulation

    I think Frazier cut the ring better and faster, and slipped and bobbed more fluidly, but really Marciano is a top 10 swarmer, as much as i criticise him.
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,578
    Jul 28, 2004
    Marciano, more than Frazier, was a puncher/swarmer.
     
  7. carlosg815

    carlosg815 Member Full Member

    466
    1
    Jun 6, 2011
    Joe Frazier was more effective, miming his style after Henry Armstrong and just about perfecting the bob and weave style. He also had some of the best footwork, workrate and stamina I have seen. For a swarmer style, you can't get much better than Joe Frazier. Rocky was great as well and is in my top 5 favorite fighters, but I think Frazier edges him out in many areas.
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,464
    9,342
    Jul 17, 2009
    This is how I see it :good
     
  9. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,632
    345
    Apr 18, 2007
    Marciano had problems with Charles smothering his shots in their first match, taking away Rocky's punching room. Tommy Gibbons did the same thing to Dempsey in Shelby. Nobody successfully smothered Frazier's punches inside in that way. If, given this style from an orthodox stance against other orthodox fighters, I've rather have a premium hook than a premium right. It's a more serviceable punch, a lower risk to unload, and requires less room to uncork.

    Joe's right uppercut was an excellent short set up shot (witness the one he raked Ziggy's head with just before the sleeper), and he dug that right well to the body. In 1969, he outswarmed and outlasted a trigger fisted peak Jerry Quarry after seven rounds of torridly paced close quarter action in Ring's FOTY. Even past prime, he looked like a category five hurricane swamping the hopelessly outmatched Terry Daniels.
     
  10. janwalshs

    janwalshs Active Member Full Member

    628
    219
    Feb 19, 2010
    Frazier, although being heavier, was far quicker with both hands and feet and just seemed mored relentless. Marciano always seemed slow and ponderous to me. Plus, I think he seemed more deadly because he was chasing mainly older, past their prime fighters. I can't see Marciano being able to apply the kind of pressure against young strong mobile fighters such as Ali, Quarry, Ellis, Mathis in the same way Joe did.
     
  11. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    Agreed.