it is clear that you have touched a nerve with bernard's boys. lots of abuse and name calling but no real valid rebuttal. bernard beat big names...
he is going to lose to enzo macc at cruiser. would that be a shock?
i think something is getting lost in translation... 1. i never said hopkins was hurt. 2. i never said hopkins hit calzaghe low. i said he...
ok let's disagree. but please just point to the bit where i said hopkins was hurt.
tired? from what? hitting calzaghe all night with colossal punches? wow calzaghe must be awesome to withstand such an onslaught. and since when is...
if calzaghe's punches are so weak and ineffective then why did the x-cuse resort to feigning a low blow and trying desperately to get calzaghe...
i don't think you are at all biased to suggest that hopkins' most celebrated wins have all been against fighters operating outside their best...
i would watch and cotto would win.
please excuse my lack of brevity... 1. carl slags joe for three years. during this time joe beats lacy, bika, manfredo, kessler, hopkins and...
hopkins was knackered and desperate and decided to cheat.
i retract "half-hearted" as it looks insulting. maybe down-hearted or resigned would be more accurate. congratulations to hopkins.
exposed, schooled, owned and (of course) great.
ok. i meant punches that were thrown with some confidence and conviction. he looked clueless and half-hearted from the start.
i will admit i thought pavlik would win. this was however based on the assumption that pavlik would throw some punches.
i think it was a factor, not the only factor.