AA live underdog?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by stevo78, May 12, 2011.

  1. taobum70

    taobum70 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    4
    I am not denying that Froch did very well against Arthut, but AA wasn't even trying. He missed several shots against Dirrell who was using good fottwork to get away, he wasn't even throwing against Froch, whether he would have landed or not.
     
  2. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    13,968
    Likes Received:
    14
    Cant see how AA can win. Too slow/one dimensional. punchers chance only.
     
  3. zenek2

    zenek2 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope abraham wins, US fighter's have too easy way in this tournament. There was 3 americans vs 3 euros, now it's 5 americans vs 3 euros. Dirrell *****'ed out from a fight with ward. Again it shows us how soft them US athletes are.
     
  4. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    6
    No, he's not more live than Shane. Shane was a puncher who was/is STILL better and smarter than Abraham except he also had a big size advantage, and Abraham will be the naturally smaller man here. I honestly don't believe Abraham TODAY is a better SMW than Shane TODAY is a welterweight. Screw it, I really don't.
     
  5. Finn73

    Finn73 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,322
    Likes Received:
    0
    It all comes down to one question: Is Abraham able to land flush on Ward? If he is (which I doubt) then Ward is in big trouble. If AA fights like he did against Froch, it is a walk in the park for Ward.

    Abraham's power shouldn't be questioned - if he lands flush, it will make Ward do the chicken dance.