And Cunningham robbed again. How the hell you find 7 or more rounds for Glazkov I have no idea, he won 5 at a push. If you think Glazkov won please post your scorecard
yeah I was literally ill at those scorecards. I could see giving him the draw, or if you really want to stretch 7-5 but 8-4 twice? Should have been 7-5 for Cunningham
Close but clear win for Glazkov. Look at how many scored it for him in the RBR thread, including IB. No robbery.
I scored one of the earlier rounds for Glaz that the annoying Harold Lederman gave to Cunningham because Glazkov may have landed fewer punches than Cunningham but those punches seemed to be more effective than the more numerous ones Cunningham landed but I didn't think Glazkov won nonetheless. I had it a draw.
HBO viewers see it as a robbery from what I gather? Viewers from other broadcasts favor glazkov? Maybe HBO influence in opinion?
:stir Yeah, HBO's "expert" boxing judge was doing a fine job at misleading people. I disagree with him, I didn't think the fight was dreadfully boring and I also disagree with him that compubox or punch statistics tell the story of the fight in its entirety.
Maybe Wilder :bbb but Klitschko would be accused of ducking Fury if he fought Cunningham. Which would have a bit of justification to it.
You guys count Cunninghams pitter patter ****, and stuff that landed mostly on the gloves as "activity" ? Face it. In the mid-late rounds Glazkov landed the harder, more telling blows and was also the aggressor. The judges saw all of these things and rightfully gave him the fight. Stop complaining over nothing.
why? he has beaten no one. all he has done is prove wlad destroys him at will. glazkov has no business in a ring with wlad either.
he staggered wilder a few times, but doesn't follow up. this fight had no business being an eliminator. unless it was a cw eliminator.