This guy is a former Olympic Champion, he won a gold medal. He knocked out Michael SPrott, clean out, this proves he can punch. He is more deserving of a title shot than the American bums such as Kingpin, Arrfatolla, Tony Thompson, Rahman, Chambers etc. Why we giving Haye **** when he gets more credible opponents than the Ukranians?
Chambers is much better than Audley. There's no comparsion. Thompson would also wipe the floor with A-Force. Arreloa would KO him and any so would Peter. About the only fighter on that list that he might have a chance against is Rahman.
Name me a world class fighter that Audley has beaten. Chambers beat Peter and Dimentrenko. And while neither of them are ATGs, they're a damn sight better than anyone on Audley's anemic resume.
He certainly deserves a shot at a title just as much as Sosnowski or Saftey Pin. Not Chambers though.
I have to agree. And Vitali did himself and his brother a great disservice by talking on the chump because now he can use that excuse.
At least Sosnowski and Johnson were rated by the WBC, Audley isn't... or not yet anyway until he slips some WBA officials some cash
So I'm trying to get this straight. All those Americans are bums, but Audley Harrison is credible because he beat Michael Sprott? Really, Michael SPROTT? Not only could Harrison not beat those guys you just named, but it's a far cry from certain that Haye could beat them.
Make Haye and Audley fight, winner gets Wlad, loser gets Vitali, then switch them and see whos champ at the end.
No, he doesn't. Sosonowski was a mandatory, since he won the EBU. And Johnson... was the only one available that wasn't already beaten by a Klitschko. But both these guys are MUCH better than a 38 year old Audley. Haye had a 50/50 offer on the table with Wladimir. There's no excuse for chosing a fight with Audley over this.