Boxrec is a joke!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ricky369, Aug 1, 2008.


Page 1 of 4
  1. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Well, I understand they put Margarito in their P4P list.(#9) But to make Cotto dissappear from the first 25 just because he lost to Margarito is unbelievable. They don't have Ivan Calderon there either. Are they running some kind of ANTI PUERTO RICAN website???? I mean look at their damn list. I can put Cotto and Calderon ahead of a few in that list:fire
     
    Ricky369, Aug 1, 2008
    Ricky369, Aug 1, 2008
    #1
  2. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,561
    2,201
    Nov 11, 2006
    I thought it was based on points, (MArgarito not having many big name wns before that, therefore not being worht many "points")and people from the site dont even touch it..

    Correct me if im wrong.
     
    MagnificentMatt, Aug 1, 2008
    MagnificentMatt, Aug 1, 2008
    #2
  3. martin0792

    martin0792 The Golden Boy Full Member

    1,260
    0
    Jul 3, 2008
    I agree There Ratings are also a load of Shite !
     
    martin0792, Aug 1, 2008
    martin0792, Aug 1, 2008
    #3
  4. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    they are a joke, and their list is **** but i don't think its because they're anti PR...its a computerized ranking system
     
    CJLightweight, Aug 1, 2008
    CJLightweight, Aug 1, 2008
    #4
  5. richie leon

    richie leon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,512
    1
    Jan 21, 2008
    They have computerized rankings that aren't based on opinions but on some kind of point system that, indeed, is completely f***ing worthless.
    Even so, boxrec IMO is a very useful site that provides a lot of info and i wouldn't wanna miss it.
     
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    #5
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    And Pavlik as No.1, bearing in mind he has beaten a grand total of one decent opponent?

    Cotto wasn't even in the top 15 prior to the Tony fight.

    It offers points on the method of victory, not many for a SD or MD, a few more for a UD, and more for a TKO/KO.

    This doesn't take into account lucky punches, fast counts, whether a fighter was dominating before being KO'd, dodgy SD's that should be UD's etc etc
     
    Beeston Brawler, Aug 1, 2008
    Beeston Brawler, Aug 1, 2008
    #6
  7. brown_bomber

    brown_bomber BROWN BOMBER Full Member

    2,973
    0
    Apr 26, 2006
    :think:think:think hmm strange maybe there editors are anti- peurto rican :D
     
    brown_bomber, Aug 1, 2008
    brown_bomber, Aug 1, 2008
    #7
  8. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    They have boxers records. Thats ok. But how can you explain Cotto dissapearing from the first 25. They have Juan Diaz there. I mean, I like Juan Diaz, But I don't think he should be higher than Cotto. And where the hell is Ivan Calderon???? The guy is a master of the boxing science. Can't punch for ****. But he has some special skills
     
    Ricky369, Aug 1, 2008
    Ricky369, Aug 1, 2008
    #8
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,142
    Jun 23, 2005
    Box rec rankings have been a joke for years. Where have you been?
     
    Pimp C, Aug 1, 2008
    Pimp C, Aug 1, 2008
    #9
  10. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    the rankings are a joke..they don't have pac at #1 p4p yet they have him as the #1 LW for example when he only beat david
     
    CJLightweight, Aug 1, 2008
    CJLightweight, Aug 1, 2008
    #10
  11. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    They still have Bernard Hopkins tops p4p even though he lost to Taylor and Calzaghe ... add to that he hasn't beaten anyone of note since DLH.
     
    fitzgeraldz, Aug 1, 2008
    fitzgeraldz, Aug 1, 2008
    #11
  12. richie leon

    richie leon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,512
    1
    Jan 21, 2008
    Didn't i already say that their ranking system is based on a point system and not on opinions, skills, potential or any of that ****? And didn't i also say it's a system that sucks ass completely?
    Please be so kind to read and interpetrate my WHOLE post before responding to it, thank you.
     
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    #12
  13. richie leon

    richie leon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,512
    1
    Jan 21, 2008
    They have Pavlik #1 p4p, that's what he meant.
     
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    richie leon, Aug 1, 2008
    #13
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    When you say "they" who are you referring to? Theres no human element to the ratings besides the input of results. I agree they are poor though hence why the idea the IBO are some kind of revolutionary sanctioning body is utter nonsense.
     
    dan-b, Aug 1, 2008
    dan-b, Aug 1, 2008
    #14
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,441
    Jun 30, 2005
    Why would anyone go to boxrec for rankings?

    You go there for research, not rankings.
     
    Thread Stealer, Aug 1, 2008
    Thread Stealer, Aug 1, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 4