Burns v Moir

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Apr 22, 2016.

  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,723
    Likes Received:
    29,071
  2. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    8,617
    Likes Received:
    1,884
    Watched some of it before and thought the same thing.
     
  3. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    8,271
    Likes Received:
    62
    Haven't watched it in a while but will give it a watch in a bit but have ask aswell - does anyone else get surprised every time they go back and watch Tommy Burns on film?? I think I am a bit unfairly dismissive of him when he comes up in discussions to be honest - because every time I actually watch one of his fights I'm always thinking, you know what Tommy Burns is actually pretty good!? :huh really good boxer a good hitter with that right hand aswell - am I getting overly impressed with him? Starting to think he might be close to a level with the likes of the Max Schmeling's of the world?? What do others think?
     
  4. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,225
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    I think he is underrated. Read my book, In the Ring With Tommy Burns. The guy had skills, could move, fight inside and out, and had power and a solid chin. History has been hard on him because he lost to Jack Johnson.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,723
    Likes Received:
    29,071

    I like his footwork,the way he gets quickly into range and then out again .He had some decent pop in that right hand too.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    58,748
    Likes Received:
    21,578
    I'd never really heard anyone say Burns was a poor fighter or an awful champion until on this forum.
    There was always a question mark on his legitimacy because Jeffries was still recently retired and unbeaten as champion, but he was definitely a very good fighter.

    Yes, Moir gives a solid effort on film.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,077
    Likes Received:
    3,733
    Compare burns common opponents with ketchells and ketchells blows him out of the water.

    Stanley Ketchell was a better fighter than Tommy Burns and the bigger puncher
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,077
    Likes Received:
    3,733
    Max Schmeling? Get out of here. Burns never in a million year would have competed with Joe Louis, let alone beat him
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,077
    Likes Received:
    3,733
    It's not that he was an awful fighter. He was a good fighter. I just think his title reign opposition was below average. A lot of title defenses but not against quality. I do give him a lot of credit for defending against the best in Jack Johnson

    Tommy had a lot of toughness
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    81,252
    Likes Received:
    21,738
    He looks good on film apart from against Johnson and O'Brien.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,723
    Likes Received:
    29,071
    Ketchel, after he fought Langford ,said he thought Tommy Burns would be harder fight for him,and he picked Burns to beat Langford..