Calzaghe already lost?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by maac, Apr 16, 2008.


  1. maac

    maac Member Full Member

    249
    144
    Apr 6, 2007
    http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20080416/i/r2691659482.jpg

    Taken today.
    I believe that Calzaghe has underestimated Hopkins. The difference
    in training regime is shown here: Hopkins is huge (frame, shoulders) and vanishes Calzaghe.
    Not studyng tapes of the opponent? are you serious?
    Age is not a factor, not at least speaking of Hopkins. I really
    had some hope in Calzaghe, but Hopkins has won all the battles
    (mental, strategic, preparation). Case closed.
    (Some miracle perhaps?)
     
  2. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    You have a strange writing style.
    Not bad,just odd.
    Anyway,yes Hops does look broader,but i think he works on that stuff with shilestone,whereas Joe is less preoccupied with this aspect.
    Youre writing off Joe based on some vague stuff here in my opinion:good
     
  3. maac

    maac Member Full Member

    249
    144
    Apr 6, 2007
    hehe, maybe because I don't a native english speaker?
     
  4. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Size will not be a factor in this fight..

    Calzaghe just needs to stay focused and he'll win !
     
  5. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,457
    1,718
    Nov 20, 2007
    Kessler and Lacy both looked bigger than Calzaghe.

    "Look at the skinny boy" people said. :D

    Calzaghe:
    This content is protected



    Kessler:
    This content is protected



    Lacy
    This content is protected



    And the taller Alfonso Gomez :D
    This content is protected
     
  6. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    Hope that didnt come across as rude,your'e literate, unlike some native English speaking people on here.:D

    I think joe is too professional to underestimate somebody like Hopkins i should also add.:good
     
  7. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Should the people picking Hopkins over Calzaghe even be considered as being conscious entities?
     
  8. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    No,theyre inter dimensional plasma creatures.
     
  9. Mikey

    Mikey I'm An Uzi Lover Full Member

    1,148
    0
    Jan 3, 2008
    Didn't everyone say Hatton had won the mental battle and Floyd looked nervous.
     
  10. Vaile

    Vaile Member Full Member

    490
    0
    Nov 29, 2007
    Size means jack. On another point Warren is like a little ****ing leprechaun, poking his little head up in pictures all of the time.
     
  11. THis is boxing not a bodybuilding contest:patsch Calzaghe will be at 175, thicker, bigger and will carry more power and strength than he did at 168, Calzaghe 7-8 years younger will out work Hops plain and simple, Hops was holding light hitting Winky Wright so much in that fight i thought he was going to try and Make Love to him, Hops can't fight a full 3 minute round, and it will show bad on Sat, as long as Cortez dosen't allow him to get away with any BULL****..
     
  12. Word! :good

    Oh and being shorter helps Joe on the inside and well all know how much quicker he is in the outside! Come to think of it, that kinda puts Hopper up **** creek! :D
     
  13. Streets_Of_Gold

    Streets_Of_Gold Member Full Member

    423
    0
    Apr 16, 2008
    This is Bernard Hopkins, not some built up Euro-dudes or fake Tyson wannabe small guy.
    This is a living legend he's meeting and I'm sure by now Joe is starting to realize the difference.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,911
    Mar 21, 2007
    Mental battles are for **** 99% of the time.

    Mind you, Hopkins is in and around the 1%.
     
  15. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Hopkin's shoulders and head look big. But his bone structure might be smaller elsewhere. I've seen in a TOT he's got 6" wrists, that's skinny as ****.