Excuse. Man, I read about that in scinece class years ago, & it was proved in that fight. "Calzaghe is amateur slapping":rofl :rofl :rofl
Jones LOOKED in shape, but he's not what he was.....Hopkins, on the other hand, seems not to age..Joe?? he will always have to wonder if his hand will go on him....that's no fun either...The whole problem here to begin with, is that haters will NEVER give Joe props no matter what he does...that is what causes all the fowl words said back and forth on here
I recall lots of your posts, and no, you are not a hater I come down on roy and hopkins, at times for one and only one reason== Calzaghe haters
WOW, 39, and joe going on 37...hey, can you haters figure that out...a whole TWO plus years older than Joe...Hopkins wa 6-7 oldrer than Joe, who at 34, fought a much younger, hungry, and prime Lacy, oh but we haters have an excuse for not mentioning all that:nut
Truth is, nuthuggers and haters are equally annoying. Overall, I give Calzaghe props for producing a great performance, showing he still has it at age 36 and proving once again that he can cause all kinds of problems to anyone who will fight him cause of his speed, awkward style and excellent stamina. But let's be honest, the Jones win doesn't rate particularly high in terms of legacy. Joe had a great performance, but it was against a very faded opponent.
Agreed 100%.. hey, 100 is your post # I am Joe fan, but I'll admit he'd likely lose to prime Roy, but it would be competative, his wok rate would still be there me thinks.....Hopkins is hard to say, cause he seems not to age,,,are you gonna tell me he looked 43 against Pavlik??
Funny thing is, I feel like going :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl with each hater post....and since your response was not one at all, cause I got ya there...you again get this:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl