Frazier-Ali I Bowe-Holyfield I Holyfield-Bowe II Hearns-Leonard II Hagler-Duran (don't know if this qualfies as close due to Hagler doing so well in the later rounds) Duran-Barkley (the knockdown is what made this clear, in my opinion. I'd have had it a draw otherwise.)
The only one I'd disagree with is Bowe-Holyfield I. That one was competitive, but at no point did it seem like Holyfield could win a round or two and be back in the fight. He lost 8 or 9 rounds and got dropped. Bowe won that fight wide.
Juan Diaz vs Paulie Malignaggi I: in my opinion Malignaggi clearly won 7 rounds and Diaz the other 5.
I agree with Morales-Pacquiao 1: I felt Morales clearly won 7 rounds. But I disagree with Holmes vs Norton - I scored it as a draw.
I always felt Hopkins Taylor II fit this perfectly. Taylor definitely won but with close scores Klitschko vs Peter I, Wlad obviously won more rounds but the knockdowns swung it to a razor thin win
Marvin was the clear winner, but most have it pretty close over 12. Marvin really separated himself and showed he was the clear winner over Duran at the end.
That is the 'only' debate there (scoring a Leonard round 10/8 once or twice). You either have it 113/112 Hearns or 112/112. Thus a draw was hardly a disgrace. And I loathe his sourness; and have Tommy as my second favourite fighter ever.
1 fact is tht Robby was vry hispanic, He Did Indeed -have tht toughness - I must, give him 1 props :good he did do well 2 survive 1 distance, Marvin Did grind him out , regardles of any kind of , pathetic counters tht , duran cud musturd up.