Darcy vs. Ketchell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Apr 14, 2009.

  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    61,430
    Likes Received:
    45,918
    Two ways to see this...

    Firstly, in 1915, Ketchell long in the tooth (we're assuming he didn't get shot), Darcy young gun. Who wins?

    Secondly, prime for prime, assuming Darcy even reached such a status.
     
  2. EireFightFan

    EireFightFan Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting one...

    In 1915, Darcy - he was a clean liver with a granite chin, and Ketchel would probably have been as you said, too long in the tooth.

    Prime 4 Prime, you can't look past Ketchel given the quality of opposition faced and the many unanswered questions surrounding Darcy.
     
  3. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    10,718
    Likes Received:
    8
    Darcy was still in his teens, for the first 10 months of 1915 anyway.

    He'd have been far too physical for Ketchel, even at this time. I dont see Ketchel lasting 20 rounds with Darcy at this stage at all.

    Darcy all the way.
     
  4. ray fredrickson

    ray fredrickson Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont know?? ..Im fascinated by OLD TYMME boxing!! Darcy Seamus where do you see Darcy if he were going today???:roll:
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    42
    Ketchel.