David Haye......

Hooliganism is one thing, racism is another. Hooligans are still in Europe. Are they all racist? No. Very few are now.

How the **** are those crimes racism? Are you saying if I burn a house down, I'm racist? What the ****? People throwing bananas at black people and chanting neo-Nazi songs is ****ing racist.

 

Answer the questions properly.

 

It's not worse.

One is ****ing war. The other is ****ing racism.

Are you not able to see the difference between a ****ing WAR and RACISM? You ****ing thick twat.

 

What is the point of this vid? It keeps cutting out on me and it's too long.

 

Hooliganism is related to soccer. Racism isn't.

What happens in Italy, England, France etc. is hooliganism. What happens in Poland is racism

Got that?

The Ultras in Europe are NOT ****ing racist. Do you honestly think these people just turn up to a football match and start singing pro-Nazi songs just at 3:30 on a Saturday? Of course not.

 

Your hero, the Warlord Winstone Churchill ( the greatest Brition ever as voted for by the british) doesn't seem to understand your point.


An uprising of more than 100,000 armed tribesmen against the British occupation swept through Iraq in the summer of 1920. In went the RAF. It flew missions totalling 4,008 hours, dropped 97 tons of bombs and fired 183,861 rounds for the loss of nine men killed, seven wounded and 11 aircraft destroyed behind rebel lines. The rebellion was thwarted, with nearly 9,000 Iraqis killed. Even so, concern was expressed in Westminster: the operation had cost more than the entire British-funded Arab rising against the Ottoman Empire in 1917-18.

The RAF was vindicated as British military expenditure in Iraq fell from £23m in 1921 to less than £4m five years later. This was despite the fact that the number of bombing raids increased after 1923 when Squadron Leader Arthur Harris - the future hammer of Hamburg and Dresden, whose statue stands in Fleet Street in London today - took command of 45 Squadron. Adding bomb-racks to Vickers Vernon troop car riers, Harris more or less invented the heavy bomber as well as night "terror" raids. Harris did not use gas himself - though the RAF had employed mustard gas against Bolshevik troops in 1919, while the army had gassed Iraqi rebels in 1920 "with excellent moral effect".

Churchill was particularly keen on chemical weapons, suggesting they be used "against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment". He dismissed objections as "unreasonable". "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes _ [to] spread a lively terror _" In today's terms, "the Arab" needed to be shocked and awed. A good gassing might well do the job.

Conventional raids, however, proved to be an effective deterrent. They brought Sheikh Mahmoud, the most persistent of Kurdish rebels, to heel, at little cost. Writing in 1921, Wing Commander J A Chamier suggested that the best way to demoralise local people was to concentrate bombing on the "most inaccessible village of the most prominent tribe which it is desired to punish. All available aircraft must be collected the attack with bombs and machine guns must be relentless and unremitting and carried on continuously by day and night, on houses, inhabitants, crops and cattle."

"The Arab and Kurd now know", reported Squadron Leader Harris after several such raids, "what real bombing means within 45 minutes a full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no effective means of escape."

In his memoir of the crushing of the 1920 Iraqi uprising, Lieutenant-General Sir Aylmer L Haldane, quotes his own orders for the punishment of any Iraqi found in possession of weapons "with the utmost severity": "The village where he resides will be destroyed _ pressure will be brought on the inhabitants by cutting off water power the area being cleared of the necessaries of life". He added the warning: "Burning a village properly takes a long time, an hour or more according to size".


[url]

This content is protected

[/url]

 

They weren't war, but are you SERIOUSLY suggesting we took those countries out of racism? We took them because, wrongly, it was profitable, not because we thought "India's full of ******s, let's kill the ****ers".

There is a HUGE difference between racism and war. I can't understand what you are struggling with.

 

A war which very few people in this country even supported anyway...

I agree with everything you've argued regarding racism, but didn't I see you say something in another thread like 'all black women are ugly' or words to that effect?

:huh

 

war1    
[wawr] Show IPA
noun, verb, warred, war·ring, adjective
–noun
1.
a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air.
2.
a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations: The two nations were at war with each other.
3.
a contest carried on by force of arms, as in a series of battles or campaigns: the War of 1812.




rac·ism   
[rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.