If there was nothing wrong ,Why did he win the first fight much easier on the scorecards than the second? Come on ! 2002-12-07 134 Jose Luis Castillo 135 46-5-1 Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W UD 12 12 referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Ken Morita 115-113 | judge: Larry O'Connell 116-113 | judge: Daniel Van de Wiele 115-113 WBC lightweight title 2002-04-20 134 Jose Luis Castillo 134½ 45-4-1 MGM Grand, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States W UD 12 12 referee: Vic Drakulich | judge: Anek Hongtongkam 116-111 | judge: John Keane 115-111 | judge: Jerry Roth 115-111 WBC lightweight title
Why do people cling on to the Castillo fight? There's a strong argument Floyd won that fight. Truth is Floyd gave Castillo an immediate rematch and beat him comfortably without injury.
You are the only person on Earth who thinks Mayweather won the first J.L. Castillo fight. The 3 judges protected Floyd's "0", but everyone at ringside scored it for Jose.
Do you have any comment on the scoring in the 2 Castillo Fights? Jr Dominated the second fight but won by a smaller margin than the first.
That's bull****, he handed that parking attendant's ass to him! The parking attendant's ass! Not Valuev's! Valuev handed HIS (the parking attendant's) ass to him (the parking attendant).
pac lost to marquez and the *******s will scream about the knock downs, floyd lost to castillo and the *****s will scream about the rematch. it doesnt change the fact that the majority saw both as a loss, and rightly so.
Pacquiao was weakened in the Morales one fight, he was also forced to use pillow gloves, that's why he destroyed him in both rematches.
Translation: "I drink sperm instead of milk" You could have kept that to yourself but whatever it's America say what you want.