oh yes. How quickly does enzo need to move up the ladder to remain relevant? I mean we can't have him fighting the likes of matthew ellis (no disrespect meant) if he is serious about being a contender again. I, as i said earlier in this thread, dont want to see it really, but if he is fighting on, then clearly he wants to get to the top again, so what should his route be? Who should he be fighting? opinions?
Enzo needs at least 10 of these type of fights. He must be built up slowly and the best title he can challenge for is the WBO. He's found his level.
Don't really understand these 'best title he can challenge for is the WBO' comments. WBO is no easier to win than any of the other three major titles these days. All depends who the belt holder is. At cruiserweight it's currently Huck, so not exactly the easiest prospect of the four belts. You also wouldn't be targeting the WBO for an 'easier' title shot if you were a heavyweight (Wlad), middleweight (Pavlik), welterweight (Pacquiao), light welterweight (Bradley) or featherweight (Lopez)...
I think he needs another two cans to knock over, enzo does not fight with no cofidence no more and that was the first interview where he seems like hes got a bit of life in him again,where as lately the guy seems like he on a constant downer.
Selecive reasoning. Historically the WBO champions and mandatorys since its inception in 1989 have ALWAYS been the weakest. Im sure even you know that.
Maccarenelli V Fragomeni that would be a great fight Fragomeni is not too much of a banger - so that is a plus for Maccarenelli And we all know Fragmoneni had David Haye out on his feet. So it would be interesting to see how Maccarenelli coped with him.