I agree with your post, but how THE **** can you say Ricky was "exposed"????? Change the thread title. atsch
Then back it up. How was Ricky "exposed"? I'm all ears. If losing to the best fighter on the planet, in his weight class when it's only your second fight there, and holding your own before getting caught by a perfect shot means you are "exposed", then every fighter who ever lost a fight ever was "exposed".
If it's attempting to explain Hatton being exposed, then I can't be bothered. I have no time for imbeciles. Can you summarize it for me?
Being exposed is such a subjective thing anyway. exposed as what?? everything in context For me, Hatton was exposed only the skill department, and in being considered as one of the top elite boxers (he simply doesnt have the slickness, head movement or adaptability the floyds, joes, bernards, and mannys do). What wasnt exposed was his heart, his courage, his humility in defeat
Bit childish this fella....... No need to spread sh*te about Hatton, the boy did ok just wasn't good enough. The only thing that has been exposed here is your one eyed and poorly informed opinion on the fight.
Of course skippy.Monday is the dead line for newbies and arm chair fans to leave this site.Make sure you close the door on your way out.
Yes old timer..... Bordering on a bully are you...very good....it's your forum...I understand...respect the veteran even if he talks sh*te. Rather arrogant of you to assume that Im new to the forum isn't it? Unfortunately unlike your good self I dont have the inate wish to inflict my childish views on this forum on a daily basis. Well mate, newsflash your an idiot flaming Hattton or any other boxer after a performance like that is pathetic, and if you dont realise that, then you don't really belong around here. Actually your right, every fighter apart from Floyd and Marciano has been exposed as a no good bum. You my friend are a bonefide genious, good luck in getting back home from the MGM Grande ring side seat you are undoubtedly sat in as I type.
All u cocksuckers with this EXPOSED BS when a fighter loses one fight should hang urselves. U keyboard warriors know jack ****, and as a soon to be pro boxer, u make me sick. One loss against top tier fighters doesnt expose u. Did hopkins expose Trinidad? Did Hagler expose Hearns? Did LaMatta expose Robinson? Give it a rest with this 'exposed' ****.
If you thought his skill compared to Floyd's was "exposed", then you simply hadn't seen enough of either guy before this fight. Skill-wise, it went precisely how 99.9999999% of people thought it would. ie. Floyd was lightyears ahead. As you rightly say, Hatton's heart etc.. weren't exposed either. So I'm still waiting for a reasonable (and not 11 pages long) response from scurlaruntings as to how Hatton was "exposed".
exposed and overrated. Here is why. Many had Hatton in their top 10 p4p, many picked him to win and the bookmakers only had PBF 4/7 favourite...hardly an overwhelming favourite then. He got busted up and stopped, losing almost every round. Compare that to how elite fighters did against PBF. And when did PBF last put a dent in an opponent, never mind stop them? He DID get exposed. He's a good fighter but not p4p material, no way. Simply put, he's not as good as was made out. 43-0-0 but against what?